Article: Retro Rockets and IP Lawyers

An excerpt from http://www.sitepoint.com/retro-rockets-ip-lawyers/, by @alexmwalker


I’ve designed many book covers for SitePoint – mostly without incident – but we did have one uncomfortable moment back in 2008.

Tasked with designing the cover for a new PHP book, I decided that a clutch of shiny, colored rockets – red, green and blue – might be a nice look. Fun, shiny and a little retro was the idea.


I trawled the big, reputable stock photo sites and eventually purchased a 3D render of a red-chequered rocket (similar to the one above). After a little Photoshop persuasion, I had added green and blue rockets to the composition, and not long after, voila! – we had a book nice cover.

End of story – or so we thought.
About 10 months later we received a letter from a legal firm representing the Tintin licensing rights empire claiming financial damages from infringement of their product.

This came as somewhat of a shock to us as:

a). Growing up with little awareness of TinTin, the rocket was just a ‘generic rocket’ to us. In fact, only two of the original 24 Tintin books featured the rocket, so you could have quite easily read some Tintin without ever coming across the rocket.

b). We’d purchased the image from one of the largest stock sites on the planet (no names, but you know them).

Checking back across the stock sites, the rocket image and any image like it had since disappeared – presumably after similar letters.


Continue reading this article on SitePoint.

This was an interesting read. (Moral: just because they’re bigger than you doesn’t make them right. )

Off Topic
But I have to say, I found this so sad:

What? Oh no!

I was a big fan of TinTin. The fact that his dog and my teddy bear shared a name ensured I felt a kind of allegiance to him from an early age. (But I doubt if I’d have been able to look at a picture of a rocket and say “That’s TinTin’s.” )

There is quite a bit of fraud in IP, Youtube is rife with it. Those organisations that make numerous spurious claims to ownership of third party content if you have music on a video. I think a lot of people just accept it, but they do go away if you challenge them, and you are right.

This topic was automatically closed 91 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.