Design & UX
Article

Puppies (Or Fun Ways to Get Sued for Copyright Infringement)

By Alex Walker

Koons' Balloon Dog (Orange)

This is ‘Balloon Dog (Orange)’, a sculpture by New York ‘appropriation artist’, Jeff Koons. It’s constructed from colored, mirror-finished stainless steel.

In 2013, this piece sold for more than $58 million – the current world record for an artwork sold by a living artist. Mr. Koons has a made a glittering career playing with themes of the ‘banality of modern life’.

It strikes me that Jeff thinks about ‘banality’ quite a lot for a guy with enough money to BUY Disneyland!

Anyway…

Jeff Koons also has a habit of getting sued for plagiarism – he’s had three significant court cases to date. While he arguably has a set of problems specific to a millionaire appropriation artist, there are probably some useful lessons for us here too.

Today I thought we’d focus on his first copyright case – the sequels are never quite as good, right?

Rogers vs. Koons

Back in the early-90’s, photographer Art Rogers sued Jeff Koons for infringing Rogers’ photo titled ‘Puppies‘ (1985) – a black and white image used mostly on greeting cards and postcards.

Puppies - Art Rogers (1985)

Puppies – Art Rogers (1985)

Koons created his ‘String of Puppies’ sculpture series in 1988 and later freely admitted using Rogers’ photograph as the basis of the work.

String of Puppies

String of Puppies

In court, Koons cited two defences we still often hear today:

  1. Fair use: the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor test.
  2. Parody: an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect.

Koons lost the case.

Why Couldn’t Koons Claim ‘Fair Use’?

We hear the ‘fair use’ concept cited often on the web. In fact, there’s an often quotes belief that a 20% change from the original work is enough to protect you.

There is no truth to that idea. How would you even begin to measure it?

Koons changed media, added colors, flowers, strange dog noses and even the modelling itself isn’t a particularly close replica of the photo. But that still wasn’t enough.

There are two main parts to determining whether copyright has been infringed. Firstly, can the original creator prove it owns the rights to the work?  Art Rogers certainly owned the original photo rights.

The second part asks whether the ‘average person’ viewing the work would recognize that one was copied from the other. It’s hard to imagine anyone believing Koons’ composition was random chance.

In short, changing the media and some detail is no shortcut to a fair use defence.

Why Couldn’t Koons Claim ‘Parody’?

On the surface of it, parody seems like a reasonable defence. After all, Koons is supposedly making a comment on society.

Unfortunately, the court didn’t buy this defence either.

Paraphrasing the court ruling as best I can, parody needs to be making fun of the item it is parodying. In other words, I’m free to parody Lady Gaga in a Lady Gaga video.

But as Koons was poking fun at modern life, in general, rather than directly at Art Rogers’ work, the court wouldn’t allow the parody defence. They reasoned that any number of other equally ‘banal’ photos could have been used instead of the puppies.

As strange as it sounds, if Rogers’ photo had been more famous – had it entered the public consciousness like, for instance, Demi Moore’s Vanity Fair cover – Koons may have had a better case (note: I am not a lawyer).

Jeff Koons

Interestingly, when Rogers won the case he received one of the four ‘String of Puppies’ sculptures produced – along with a sizable cash settlement. That sculpture was valued at $400K back in 1992. Who knows what it is worth today?

Ironically, Koons probably could have had an assistant license the ‘Puppies’ photo for $50. I guess the lesson is: If you’re a big-shot artist, don’t be a cheapskate.

But then again, maybe the Rogers court case was just another PR whistle-stop on the way to Koons becoming the ‘$58-Million Man’?

Maybe everyone’s a winner, baby!

(Well, except the poor balloon artists of the world, but give them time, give them time..)

  • http://onsman.com/ ronsman

    One thing that’s important to note is that (World International Property Organisation notwithstanding), copyright law is not international. Most countries have their own variations, including things like how long an originator of a work retains copyright, definitions of fair use, parody, etc. My (limited) understanding of the US law is that if Koons had, for example, changed the human heads to dogs, it might have been accepted as parody (and some kind of a statement about parenting, perhaps). On the web, this gets really complicated when, say, a US developer codes a site designed by an Australian for a Japanese customer and it resides on a server in South Africa. If it’s an obvious copy of someone else’s site, who gets sued – and where?

    • Melinda Mouton

      Marissa Meyer , Yahoo CEO has gone so far as to Support the practice “Work at home” that I have been doing since last year . In this year till now I have made 58k dollars with my computer , despite the fact that I am a college student . Even newly joined person can make 35h easily and the average increases with time … Look here for details .

      www.NestleUSA.yj.ae
      ➣W

    • http://sitepoint.com Alex Walker

      Definitely. We had a european rights owner employing australian lawyers to write us nasty letters for an image we’d legimately purchased from a US site. Messy.

    • http://sitepoint.com Alex Walker

      Definitely. We had a european rights owner employing australian lawyers to write us nasty letters for an image we’d legimately purchased from a US site. Messy.

  • Patrick Catanzariti

    Loved this article! Great stuff Alex!!! Rather disappointed in that there was no copyright infringement in the article itself (or was there?) ;)

    • http://sitepoint.com Alex Walker

      >Rather disappointed in that there was no copyright infringement in the article itself (or was there?) ;)

      Hehe, well, of course, that would be for a court to decide, @patrick_catanzariti:disqus ;)

      • Karey Black

        This year I have made 72,000 dollars so far with my pc and I am a university student . I am linked with a business entity that outsource online jobs . I heard about it previous year and now I have made a great cash . It is very friendly to it’s users and I am just so happy to have that option …..

        www.yfuusa.da.cx
        ♣38

Recommended

Learn Coding Online
Learn Web Development

Start learning web development and design for free with SitePoint Premium!

Get the latest in Design, once a week, for free.