mom.com (and deciding exactly what to do with that would be half the fun)
Cromulent:
What has been shown in recent years is the domain name is pretty irrelevant. Just look at sites like Flickr, Google or Facebook. Before they existed those domain names would most likely be considered junk.
So the real money is in brands not domains. You can turn a meaningless domain name into the most valuable domain name on the internet as long as you can turn it into a brand and have effective marketing behind it. Or simply a good idea that interests people.
Good points, but what you’re talking about is domain development and brand development. If you have a brief and memorable domain name that’s relevant to the product, a lot of that work is done for you from the start and the brand development will go easier, IMHO.
dvduval
February 18, 2010, 4:42pm
22
I would pick something with massive value that couldn’t be swiped up by a corporations lawyers such as hosting.com or finance.com
and I’d start a blog about, you guessed it, some of the turds that I’ve worked for over the years…
A bit of a tangent here, but why can you register single letter .net addresses but not single letter .com addresses?
Ok. I suppose if I had google.ca that would be the best investment
The answer seems to be you can register single letter domain names (of any TLD), but they are reserved. Exceptions can be made (for example - x.com redirects to Paypal), but it seems to be registered back in the early days of the internet & you’d have to lobby pretty hard though, as they don’t give them out to anybody - for example, g.cn redirects to Google, but they’ve been unable to register g.com .
Source: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/no-gcom-ycom-mcom-why-not/6190/
cameras.com
I was surprised on how much people bid on that domain.
Icedout
February 19, 2010, 6:21pm
28
probably be a three letter domain or “movies.com ”
Yup. That’s exactly what I was going to say.
It is an interesting story how that domain name was stolen from the rightful owner and how it took years for him to get it back.
I believe I read somewhere that the sex.com domain name has generated over $100 million in revenues.
Computerworld covers a range of technology topics, with a focus on these core areas of IT: generative AI, Windows, mobile, Apple/enterprise, office suites, productivity software, and collaboration software, as well as relevant information about...
Est. reading time: 1 minute
Can’t have it, I chose it first
PS: If they ever release an .ex ccTLD I wanna buy al.ex
Please read post 9, don’t duplicate your post and come back later
AlexDawson:
Can’t have it, I chose it first
PS: If they ever release an .ex ccTLD I wanna buy al.ex
Please read post 9, don’t duplicate your post and come back later
Please check out post 23 because you’re on track to earning yourself a feature spot on the blog which I would have constructed had I snatched my favorite domain name.
I only mentioned the post (jokingly) as cross posting (inclusive of duplicates) are against the forum rules… and so is naughty behaviour (hint).
joebert
February 20, 2010, 7:00pm
33
I’d probably have to go with sex.com or porn.com just for the resale value.
ralphm
February 21, 2010, 1:51pm
34
Or both?
Had I a time machine, I’d go back and maybe snaffle something like apple.com . Bet that would have sold for a pretty penny when Apple went online.
silentg
February 21, 2010, 5:12pm
35
Sex(.)com is going to be on sale soon. Get some investors and buy it.
Yes, you are correct. The owner is in foreclosure.
I had you down as more of a diy.com man
r937
February 22, 2010, 1:22pm
38
diy.com isn’t worth as much as sex.com , is it
(doing it yourself isn’t the same, man)
I’d buy one-word domains until I was broke. Then try to find food until people started buying them.