Yeah, fair points! I don’t see them as mutually exclusive either, but sometimes it feels like AI ‘simplifies’ things by sneaking in more complexity behind the scenes. And you’re right, us fleshy meatbags still need visuals to actually make sense of what’s happening . As for timelines, missing them is nothing new, but I wonder if AI will really help us stick to deadlines more often, or just give us shinier excuses when we don’t.
I dont think the excuses will be shinier even. Muddier, because people won’t actually understand WHY the deadlines got missed, because they’ve offloaded the thinking to AI.
Ha, that’s a really good point. If people stop digging into the ‘why’ and just trust whatever the AI spits out, the misses might feel even more confusing. Almost like hiding the messy kitchen behind a fancy restaurant door. Maybe the real challenge isn’t AI planning the work, but making sure teams actually understand the reasoning behind it
Now, if we persist, maturity of use will eventually mean that we do end up with a better tool. But it’ll take a while, and take people investing energy into it.
Like any invention to improve workflow, one must resist the urge to say “the new tool will do it all for us, we don’t have to do anything”, and incorporate new tools into the workflow, not seek to replace the workflow.
Exactly, I like how you put that. It’s less about the tool doing everything for us and more about how we fold it into the way we already work. Kind of like when spreadsheets first showed up, they didn’t replace thinking; they just gave us a faster way to run the numbers. Maybe AI is the same: it can speed things up, but the discipline and judgment still have to come from the team.