What’s a good way to do this that makes everyone happy?
If she’s bringing in business, it’s her client. She gets paid a percentage.
Chances are, anyone who “gets” the benefit of having a website is going to cause some friction with the average web developer – who knows the features required to have a web site. Completely different things.
It’s hard to tell, everyone has varying levels of understanding. But technology and marketing bring entirely different sets of requirements to web development. Sooner or later you’re going to find out, from the marketing standpoint, having a site is pointless.
In other words, the standard development of a site without a purpose “just to have a site” will not in any way, shape or form, deliver the benefits. A marketing driven approach is very different from a technology driven approach.
Web development, and I’m simply playing the percentages here, is a marketing horror show. And that is going to cause frictions when the marketer doesn’t see what he or she is looking for in the implementation.
Now you might get one of those “build me a splash page and make it Über cool” marketers. They’ve got no clue about producing a response and can peacefully interact with the vast majority of web developers. (as they share common interests of never connecting any specific thing in site development to a result).
Not so direct response marketers. They need a very specific kind of web developer. Otherwise, you’re going to be in constant conflict. And you simply won’t even know how to build a response driven site. (Parley-vous A/B Split Run Multivariate Coding? …CRM? …Sprecenzie Planogram?)
Most ecommerce expert developers are experts in OScommerce or Zen cart installation – not how to design them to maximize sales through visual merchandising design. And no, calling what you’re doing visual merchandising doesn’t turn the current vending machine model these carts are based on into a store supporting user shopping psychology.
If you’re willing to develop marketing driven sites, well and good. However the odds argue against whatever you’re doing now being marketing driven design.
These will be a different kind of client, wanting a different kind of site. (probably)
It very much depends on the type of developer and the type of marketer involved. The wrong matchup will have the marketer promising things to clients the coder hasn’t the faintest idea how to deliver.
Related:
Never Get Involved in a Land War in Asia (or Build a Website for No Reason) Most sites are excuse driven – not purpose driven.
Calling All Designers: Learn to Write! Keyword stuffing generic text is not writing copy. If the marketer is worth her salt, they’ll be able to write results-producing copy, no problem.
[URL=“http://www.apogeehk.com/articles/HowDirectMarketingAndUserExperienceAreTheSame.html”]
How Direct Marketing and User Experience Are the Same here, both share an understanding of user testing and human factors. Most developers don’t know what Fitts’ Law is, and couldn’t apply it to CSS design to save their very lives. They don’t develop UIs, they decorate them.
It could also work out where both share an aversion to ever testing, and prefer vapid copy and pointless flash animation.