I need to pass in a large number of Ids for a WHERE IN statement and wanted to know if there are any limits/issues with this?
SELECT * FROM [sometable] WHERE id IN (id1,id2,id3,id4)
The number of Ids could well be 1,000!
Your thoughts much appreciated
much depends on which database system you’re running, which you neglected to mention
for example, in SQL Server, the size of a query string is limited to 65K
but of more concern is the sheer unwieldiness of this approach – where are these ids coming from?
the reason i ask is that there are likely better ways of doing whatever it is you’re trying to do
The Ids will be coming from another database (a flat file database system) that I have access to via an API. I am using MS SQL 2008 work group to perform the TSQL with the WHERE IN clause.
Basically there is a relationship between this flat file database and data stored in the MS SQL 2008 database. A query is performed on the flat file database and we show data in the MS SQL 2008 database.
Hope this makes sense?
why not import the flat file? it’d make things substantially simpler, and likely more efficient