Please clarify few of my doubts about MIT license.
MIT license allows a licensee to distribute the software with a different license. But is it applicable to the derived work only or to the verbatim copy as-well?
Lets say, I make a derived work out of MIT licensed software and then distribute it through a more restricting license ( lets say proprietary - distributing not allowed ).
But the MIT license expects
“The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.”
Of-course there won’t be any issues in including the copyright. But if we include the license text, won’t it contradict the new more restrictive license ie. a proprietary license?
Why do you think a random person here will be any more knowledgeable? You need to speak to a lawyer if you’re not sure, or talk to the people at MIT who developed it.
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. But I already gone through MIT license and countless of other articles / blogs on this subject. MIT license is not clearing specifying the aspects I asked in the original question.
“The MIT License states more explicitly the rights given to the end-user, including the right to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell the software.”