Unfortunately, it’s no one’s fault that you don’t read announcements.
So, this is just a perhaps it should be changed
FWIW, as a staff member (in case you didn’t know) I agree with Mitt’s title being changed 100%. My guess is that both he and the mods/admins just overlooked it. I could be wrong though.
There is no such thing as good censorship.
Yeah, we’ll have to agree to disagree. It’s not cloaked censorship - people can see clearly what was edited, by whom, and when. And making things more clear, correcting misleading topics, misspelled words, etc in a topic title are nothing but good, in my opinion, and can easily be flagged and discussed/changed again as we’ve established. That’s just a personal opinion.
In addition, you have to agree that there are things that could be posted in this forum that need censoring. Unless you mean that’s it is fine for people to post anything on any topic here. I’m curious how long you’d stay on an un-moderated and un-censored forum as it filled with spam and who knows what else.
But it’s not! I’m sure that your opinion is noted though.
And with me and my poll, a problem did happen, unfortunately.
Calling out the TL3 position for this is also somewhat moot, as at least some of the staff members very well might have done a similar thing. We can probably divorce your annoyance at the TL3 position from what happened here, which is a difference in opinion on how a forum must be censored.
It’s unfortunate that, in your opinion, all complaints or discussions on policy must result in a “winner”
Guess, again, that we just have different outlooks on things.