Sorry, @neelam, but no. As I said earlier:
So sites which allow user-submitted, followed links are likely to be regarded as link schemes by Google, and placing your links there is at best useless, and at worst, leaves you open to penalties.
Any links intended to manipulate PageRank or a site’s ranking in Google search results may be considered part of a link scheme and a violation of Google’s Webmaster Guidelines. This includes any behavior that manipulates links to your site or outgoing links from your site.
And it goes on:
The following are examples of link schemes which can negatively impact a site’s ranking in search results:
…
- Large-scale article marketing or guest posting campaigns with keyword-rich anchor text links
As I said before,
I don’t know how many ways I can say this, because so few people seem to be able to understand it, but building backlinks with the intention of manipulating search engine results is a technique which has long since had its day, and is now more likely to lead to your site being penalised than to have any positive effect.
That does not only apply to Google. Bing says this (my bold):
Links pointing to your site help Bing discover new pages on your site. It also, traditionally, is regarded as a signal of popularity. The site linking to your content is essentially telling Bing they trust your content. As a result, Bing rewards links that have grown organically, that is, that have been added over time by content creators on other trusted, relevant websites made to drive real users from their site to your site. Abusive tactics that aim to inflate the number and nature of inbound links such as links buying, participating in link schemes (link farms, link spamming and excessive link manipulation) can lead to your site being delisted from the Bing index.
https://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/webmaster-guidelines-30fba23a