If you have kick *** content then you can get 1000 links in no time 
I think your website will be penalized if the 1000 backlinks occur within a few days, and then stop.
I would rather have consistent 10 backlinks per day from PR6 and above websites. Even if I can get a backlink from a PR8 website in a month, I will be very happy with it.
What if someone is just trying to hurt your reputation by building too much back links in short time? So, I think itās just fine.
But, Iād rather take time building quality backlinks than just quantity.
If you try to add 100 links/day in one week or less all of them will be nulled in Google 
. And after this you have to work again from - not from 0 . Good luck!
Could you source this pleaseā¦ myth statements like this only hurt the community.
Try RSS it will help you to get backlinks.
Try to not add 1000 links in some days because google will ban your site or suspend it in google pages for days,months
I would say that does not matter, because you never want to get backlinks super fast. Might get penalized by google.
But, if I was to do it I think it would take like a month.
does anyone have any proof that gaining too many backlinks quickly can result in penalty from google?
it doesnt make senseā¦ when the tiger woods game (for example) went viral it gained hundreds of backlinks in a couple days. Was it penalized? absolutely NOT. So either many of you are talking out your backside and spreading disinformation, or google really just liked the game.
Lets avoid speculation based on flawed logic, and look at some facts here.
how is it flawed logic?
The logic behind saying that Google would penalize a site for getting 1,000 backlinks in a day is the same logic behind saying that Google wonāt value a site that has been up for 1 week and is trying to rank with a site that has been up for 5 years with similar content.
If you gain 1,000 links in 10 days, and your site isnāt a well established site, chances are your efforts arenāt due to respectable, organic linking.
Look at the big picture of how a site is ranked, gains page rank, and is listed on the first page of google. If throwing up 10 sites in 10 days, and getting 1,000 links on each site in 10 days yielded positive results on google, everyone would be doing it and getting loads of traffic and monetizing the results.
The idea of saying link farming follows some sort of intelligent logic would be similar to defending the infomercials that claim you can get rich on real estate deals even with no money to invest.
So sitepoint puts up an awesome article that touches hundred of bloggersā¦ they all link to it and you feel sitepoint will be punished for this? there is zero logic there my friend. Only propaganda.
There is a world of difference from gaining fast backlinks and putting up a brand new site. Your comparing apples to oranges Iām afraid. The issue at hand here is nothing more than the rapid addition of many backlinks.
If you gain 1,000 links in 10 days, and your site isnāt a well established site, chances are your efforts arenāt due to respectable, organic linking.
āChances areā is another way of saying I have not enough facts and am just speculating. (aka flawed logic)
Look at the big picture of how a site is ranked, gains page rank, and is listed on the first page of google. If throwing up 10 sites in 10 days, and getting 1,000 links on each site in 10 days yielded positive results on google, everyone would be doing it and getting loads of traffic and monetizing the results.
as you know (and mentioned) backlinks are only 1 small factor in SERPS, you need to rethink the logic of āwhat others do on their sites will hurt my siteā. This is again an example of flawed logic as is it based on zero fact.
The idea of saying link farming follows some sort of intelligent logic would be similar to defending the infomercials that claim you can get rich on real estate deals even with no money to invest.
Having your URL added to 1000 link farms wont hurt you. But as we know (fact) it probably wont help you much either. If you stick with only the facts on this discussion you might realize the same conclusion I did. Otherwise your just contributing to the load of disinformation in this thread.
Bring facts and Iām all ears. Bring rumors and expect nothing more than to be debunked.
Alright then:
So sitepoint puts up an awesome article that touches hundred of bloggersā¦
So are we āassumingā we are dealing with a site that has the reputation of sitepoint, or are you claiming that sites like sitepoint would be treated the same as my personal blog or website?
There is a world of difference from gaining fast backlinks and putting up a brand new site. Your comparing apples to oranges Iām afraid.
Not really, Iām comparing time frames. The time frame of both a sites age and how quickly links and information is added. Why would you assume that a search engine could distinguish sites based on age (time) but not the speed of backlinking (time). Iām comparing apples.
Once again ask for facts, like SEO is based on some abundance of factual data that follows a set of known rules.
If you do any amount of searching online you will see that most SEO contains a LARGE amount of ātry and seeā approaches with āin my experienceā proofs.
I could provide you with many links stating that people agree that rapid accumulation of backlinks can have negative affects. Is that 100% of the time across the board on every site? No.
Youāre asking for facts on something that is and will always be speculative and based on common experience. Can you provide facts and links showing that adding backlinks rapidly does not affect a common site negatively?
You didnāt really debunk anything, you just disagreed and tried to say Iām wrong by not bringing facts, while at the same time you provide no facts either.
And most comments on the forum center around a consensus that in order for the average person to get those links that fast would require acquiring a number of bad links.
For the average person working on an average site, youāre not dealing with viral backlinking for interesting content, and youāre not a popular site with a solid serp placement.
Linkfarming is based around the idea of massive amounts of links as fast as possible and those are penalized and considered blackhat: http://www.seoxp.net/?p=162.
So maybe a better thing for me to have said is that speed is not the issue, itās the quality of the link and the method used. But if you sacrifice quality and enlist blackhat techniques for the sake of speed, then you are asking for trouble.
Let me be clear:
regardless of the domain in question, there is a world of difference gaining 1000 backlinks from bad neighborhoods and simply gaining 1000 backlinks quickly.
agreed
I would rather focus on gaining quality backlinks because quality than quantity
right, but oswebhosting was saying that if you gain quality links quickly, there is no evidence that gaining them quickly would hurt your rankings.
oh sureā¦ sum up my entire long winded argument with 1 sententious sentence.
well done 
Man that would take all day to get one thousand in a day. Not even worth it in my opinion.
I am also want 100 link in a day. But it is a very difficult to any one. If you do 1000 links in a day means it is a spamming for google and google submit your site in send box. So you never do mistake like this.