<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Research Essentials Part 2: How to Select the Right Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tentonjim</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-917982</link>
		<dc:creator>tentonjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=8139#comment-917982</guid>
		<description>Good post! I appreciate that you pointed out that relevancy and ROI (meaning dollars) are what really matter. I find this aspect of the web very interesting... the many SEO tactics available to get someone to your site in the first place, and then the on page human factors to get them to click, or &quot;buy&quot; if you are selling.

By targeting highly relevant (although possibly not as popular) terms it makes the &quot;click&quot; that much easier, because the user has already been qualified to some extent. There is a company in Jacksonville, FL - &lt;strong&gt;Marketing Experiments&lt;/strong&gt; (MECLABS) - that makes available a ton of data and formulas for on page &lt;em&gt;marketing&lt;/em&gt; optimization (meaning treatments, not seo). The tactics and formulas are both interesting and helpful in getting that ROI once you have drawn the user to your site.

I am not affiliated with MECLABS but they do have some good stuff, worth checking out. &lt;a href=&quot;http://meclabs.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://meclabs.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post! I appreciate that you pointed out that relevancy and ROI (meaning dollars) are what really matter. I find this aspect of the web very interesting&#8230; the many SEO tactics available to get someone to your site in the first place, and then the on page human factors to get them to click, or &#8220;buy&#8221; if you are selling.</p>
<p>By targeting highly relevant (although possibly not as popular) terms it makes the &#8220;click&#8221; that much easier, because the user has already been qualified to some extent. There is a company in Jacksonville, FL &#8211; <strong>Marketing Experiments</strong> (MECLABS) &#8211; that makes available a ton of data and formulas for on page <em>marketing</em> optimization (meaning treatments, not seo). The tactics and formulas are both interesting and helpful in getting that ROI once you have drawn the user to your site.</p>
<p>I am not affiliated with MECLABS but they do have some good stuff, worth checking out. <a href="http://meclabs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://meclabs.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihaela Lica</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-917572</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihaela Lica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=8139#comment-917572</guid>
		<description>Genesis, the quotes narrow the search, basically telling Google to consider the exact words, in the exact order, without any changes. Not a very great SEO achievement to rank for terms that need this technique - as not many users &quot;bother&quot; to use the quotation marks.

There are many other ways to use Google search though, formats the ordinary users are not even aware of. Take a look at this link: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=136861</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genesis, the quotes narrow the search, basically telling Google to consider the exact words, in the exact order, without any changes. Not a very great SEO achievement to rank for terms that need this technique &#8211; as not many users &#8220;bother&#8221; to use the quotation marks.</p>
<p>There are many other ways to use Google search though, formats the ordinary users are not even aware of. Take a look at this link: <a href="http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=136861" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=136861</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GenesisDavies</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-917549</link>
		<dc:creator>GenesisDavies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=8139#comment-917549</guid>
		<description>Yet another useful post, Mihaela! You`ve done an excellent job of covering the information needed for keyword selection. I do have a question though:

When you do a search for a particular term in Google, the results will bring back any of the words in the search, not just the phrase. I was told to use &quot;search term&quot; with the quotes to find a more accurate number on the competition. What are your thoughts on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another useful post, Mihaela! You`ve done an excellent job of covering the information needed for keyword selection. I do have a question though:</p>
<p>When you do a search for a particular term in Google, the results will bring back any of the words in the search, not just the phrase. I was told to use &#8220;search term&#8221; with the quotes to find a more accurate number on the competition. What are your thoughts on that?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisCree</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-917512</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisCree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=8139#comment-917512</guid>
		<description>I have to stifle a laugh when I hear someone say &quot;my site is on the front page of Google&quot; because they obviously don&#039;t know what a meaningless statement that is. I want to scream, &quot;For what search term?!&quot; 

Fact is they rarely even know.

So often it comes down to ego vs bank account. Like Dan said above, ranking high does not equal traffic. And as the article pointed out, traffic doesn&#039;t necessarily convert. I&#039;ll take my bank account over my ego (most) every time. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to stifle a laugh when I hear someone say &#8220;my site is on the front page of Google&#8221; because they obviously don&#8217;t know what a meaningless statement that is. I want to scream, &#8220;For what search term?!&#8221; </p>
<p>Fact is they rarely even know.</p>
<p>So often it comes down to ego vs bank account. Like Dan said above, ranking high does not equal traffic. And as the article pointed out, traffic doesn&#8217;t necessarily convert. I&#8217;ll take my bank account over my ego (most) every time. ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumberg</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-917450</link>
		<dc:creator>rumberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=8139#comment-917450</guid>
		<description>Great story Dan. For most people out there seo is still not a term and so you can achieve great results for them with only a little understanding of search enginges (well, google) and optimizing the code of a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story Dan. For most people out there seo is still not a term and so you can achieve great results for them with only a little understanding of search enginges (well, google) and optimizing the code of a website.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/15/keywords-selection-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-916870</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=8139#comment-916870</guid>
		<description>Another great keyword post! I noticed you briefly mentioned brands, and I&#039;d like to expand on the importance of brands in regards to SEO (particularly in reference to title tags).
One of my SEO clients is a big brand in a specific industry, and wasn&#039;t performing as well as they could for the high search traffic keywords they cover. So naturally, I optimized the title tags for these terms like so: Product A, B, C - Company. (Their old title tag format was simply: &quot;Company - Motto/Slogan&quot;). 
I varied the products and title tags for each page, and called it a day. Their ranks improved for the different products, and traffic from those keywords shot up through the roof (first page or even top 3). Good job me, right?
Wrong.
Though the search engine loved the results (and they still ranked #1 for all their branded keywords/searches) the actual search engine users clicked on the client&#039;s website A LOT LESS (up to 50% decline in traffic for some terms). Note: Some of the long-tail keywords were causing the brand name to be pushed into an ellipsis.... thus harming the user experience.
Once I changed the title tags to: &quot;Company - Product A, B, C&quot; the traffic came back and the rankings remained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great keyword post! I noticed you briefly mentioned brands, and I&#8217;d like to expand on the importance of brands in regards to SEO (particularly in reference to title tags).<br />
One of my SEO clients is a big brand in a specific industry, and wasn&#8217;t performing as well as they could for the high search traffic keywords they cover. So naturally, I optimized the title tags for these terms like so: Product A, B, C &#8211; Company. (Their old title tag format was simply: &#8220;Company &#8211; Motto/Slogan&#8221;).<br />
I varied the products and title tags for each page, and called it a day. Their ranks improved for the different products, and traffic from those keywords shot up through the roof (first page or even top 3). Good job me, right?<br />
Wrong.<br />
Though the search engine loved the results (and they still ranked #1 for all their branded keywords/searches) the actual search engine users clicked on the client&#8217;s website A LOT LESS (up to 50% decline in traffic for some terms). Note: Some of the long-tail keywords were causing the brand name to be pushed into an ellipsis&#8230;. thus harming the user experience.<br />
Once I changed the title tags to: &#8220;Company &#8211; Product A, B, C&#8221; the traffic came back and the rankings remained.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
