<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5 Most Under-Used HTML Tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:23:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: memco</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-918824</link>
		<dc:creator>memco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-918824</guid>
		<description>To those recommending the microformat for addresses: do you do this under the auspice that people can actually use that data in other programs or just that it&#039;s a handy feature to have on top your code?  I&#039;m not too hip on having a div or span for every single element.  However, I&#039;m also conflicted by having to use br tags after every piece of information.  All in all, I just feel like it&#039;s hopeless no matter which way I go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those recommending the microformat for addresses: do you do this under the auspice that people can actually use that data in other programs or just that it&#8217;s a handy feature to have on top your code?  I&#8217;m not too hip on having a div or span for every single element.  However, I&#8217;m also conflicted by having to use br tags after every piece of information.  All in all, I just feel like it&#8217;s hopeless no matter which way I go.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madr</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-917444</link>
		<dc:creator>madr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-917444</guid>
		<description>Great article! I believe it would have a bigger effect in another forum than sitepoint, though; people here tend to write semantic markup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I believe it would have a bigger effect in another forum than sitepoint, though; people here tend to write semantic markup.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uxgeoff</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-892149</link>
		<dc:creator>uxgeoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-892149</guid>
		<description>Great article. If you&#039;re wanting to just see what every current HTML tag looks like on one page, check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://showmehtml.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Show Me HTML&lt;/a&gt;.  Hope you find it useful (I do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. If you&#8217;re wanting to just see what every current HTML tag looks like on one page, check out <a href="http://showmehtml.com" rel="nofollow">Show Me HTML</a>.  Hope you find it useful (I do).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Buckler</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-891610</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Buckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-891610</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are these original tags? Or Tags that have been implemented in later HTML standards?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Most were introduced in HTML 4.0, so they&#039;ve been around over 10 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are these original tags? Or Tags that have been implemented in later HTML standards?</p></blockquote>
<p>Most were introduced in HTML 4.0, so they&#8217;ve been around over 10 years!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry jiang</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-891295</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry jiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-891295</guid>
		<description>ALL of them are very usefull when i build my website~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL of them are very usefull when i build my website~~</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetFoodz.Info</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-889525</link>
		<dc:creator>PetFoodz.Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-889525</guid>
		<description>Are these original tags? Or Tags that have been implemented in later HTML standards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these original tags? Or Tags that have been implemented in later HTML standards?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danieldigriz</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-886818</link>
		<dc:creator>danieldigriz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-886818</guid>
		<description>Good work. I found it a fascinating visit, and just the right size for a post like this. Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work. I found it a fascinating visit, and just the right size for a post like this. Nice job.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somecallmejosh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-886516</link>
		<dc:creator>somecallmejosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-886516</guid>
		<description>@Rich,

I used to use the address element alot, but now I use hCard microformat instead.  http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rich,</p>
<p>I used to use the address element alot, but now I use hCard microformat instead.  <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard" rel="nofollow">http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-883392</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-883392</guid>
		<description>According to Opera, only 15% of the forms contains a label element. And from my experience, I was almost surprised that so &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; used it...

&lt;label&gt; is probably the most underused semantical tag in forms. I see many have &quot;seen the light&quot; and uses CSS to layout a form, but still uses div/span to format a label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Opera, only 15% of the forms contains a label element. And from my experience, I was almost surprised that so <em>many</em> used it&#8230;</p>
<p>&lt;label&gt; is probably the most underused semantical tag in forms. I see many have &#8220;seen the light&#8221; and uses CSS to layout a form, but still uses div/span to format a label.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hucklesby</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/02/24/five-under-used-html-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-883330</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hucklesby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=5827#comment-883330</guid>
		<description>My solution to the Q tag not being fully supported in IE is to use a small .htc file that I created. Much easier than deleting, then adding back quotes, especially if you use &quot;curly&quot; quotes and have nested quotes.

Of course, this does not work for visitors that have IE&#039;s security settings set to &quot;high&quot; - so I add coloring and/or italics to quoted text for this eventuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My solution to the Q tag not being fully supported in IE is to use a small .htc file that I created. Much easier than deleting, then adding back quotes, especially if you use &#8220;curly&#8221; quotes and have nested quotes.</p>
<p>Of course, this does not work for visitors that have IE&#8217;s security settings set to &#8220;high&#8221; &#8211; so I add coloring and/or italics to quoted text for this eventuality.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
