<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Was a Good Idea for the AFP to Turn Off RSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:10:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brothercake</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-858310</link>
		<dc:creator>brothercake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-858310</guid>
		<description>So when you say it was &quot;a good idea&quot; you mean it was &quot;beneficial to their commercial agenda&quot;, rather than being a good idea in the wider sense (of which there may be many interpretations, both good and bad)

Just clarifying..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when you say it was &#8220;a good idea&#8221; you mean it was &#8220;beneficial to their commercial agenda&#8221;, rather than being a good idea in the wider sense (of which there may be many interpretations, both good and bad)</p>
<p>Just clarifying..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosCor</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-857270</link>
		<dc:creator>JosCor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-857270</guid>
		<description>Cierto es que el negocio de AFP es publicar informacion, pero entonces por que ofrecer de antes el servicio de RSS? ahora desechan la libertad que ofrece internet?
Traslation:
I wish my best traduction on my first post.
the fact is that AFP business is information, but i dont&#039;n understand why negate a service that they offer some time ago, now they negate the internet freedom?

my best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cierto es que el negocio de AFP es publicar informacion, pero entonces por que ofrecer de antes el servicio de RSS? ahora desechan la libertad que ofrece internet?<br />
Traslation:<br />
I wish my best traduction on my first post.<br />
the fact is that AFP business is information, but i dont&#8217;n understand why negate a service that they offer some time ago, now they negate the internet freedom?</p>
<p>my best wishes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalek</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-857162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-857162</guid>
		<description>I no rite?
myspacebardoesntwerkrite

I get a little uptight about &quot;alot&quot; too though, and &quot;waist&quot; refers to anatomy, not refuse.
That one may&#039;ve contributed to my divorce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no rite?<br />
myspacebardoesntwerkrite</p>
<p>I get a little uptight about &#8220;alot&#8221; too though, and &#8220;waist&#8221; refers to anatomy, not refuse.<br />
That one may&#8217;ve contributed to my divorce.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Catone</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-856780</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Catone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-856780</guid>
		<description>@icheb:

alot is not a word.
awhile, however, is most definitely a word.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/awhile

I often use the latter, but never the former. Though I may have used it wrong by placing it after a preposition (in).  Is it really a big deal either way? (Also, a spell check wouldn&#039;t catch a minor grammar mistake, if I have indeed made one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@icheb:</p>
<p>alot is not a word.<br />
awhile, however, is most definitely a word.</p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/awhile" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/awhile</a></p>
<p>I often use the latter, but never the former. Though I may have used it wrong by placing it after a preposition (in).  Is it really a big deal either way? (Also, a spell check wouldn&#8217;t catch a minor grammar mistake, if I have indeed made one.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-856513</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-856513</guid>
		<description>Yes people who can&#039;t spell properly really anger me too, just like people who can&#039;t see or hear... So so annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes people who can&#8217;t spell properly really anger me too, just like people who can&#8217;t see or hear&#8230; So so annoying.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPRTM</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-856276</link>
		<dc:creator>IPRTM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-856276</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sounds like you could do with some anger management courses.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sounds like he could do with alot of them... lol..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sounds like you could do with some anger management courses.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds like he could do with alot of them&#8230; lol..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyssen</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-856191</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-856191</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is it that I want to punch people in the face when they write “awhile” or “alot”?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sounds like you could do with some anger management courses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is it that I want to punch people in the face when they write “awhile” or “alot”?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds like you could do with some anger management courses.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icheb</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-856129</link>
		<dc:creator>Icheb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-856129</guid>
		<description>Why is it that I want to punch people in the face when they write &quot;awhile&quot; or &quot;alot&quot;? Why is it that I can&#039;t take people seriously when they make a mistake that could easily be caught by a spell checker? Why is it that seemingly millions of people have adopted a spelling mistake that makes no fucking sense? How do you write &quot;a short while&quot; in your world? Is it &quot;ashortwhile&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that I want to punch people in the face when they write &#8220;awhile&#8221; or &#8220;alot&#8221;? Why is it that I can&#8217;t take people seriously when they make a mistake that could easily be caught by a spell checker? Why is it that seemingly millions of people have adopted a spelling mistake that makes no fucking sense? How do you write &#8220;a short while&#8221; in your world? Is it &#8220;ashortwhile&#8221;?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armchaircritic</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/31/it-was-a-good-idea-for-the-afp-to-turn-off-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-856114</link>
		<dc:creator>armchaircritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3573#comment-856114</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with the conclusions of this post. I know of a few webmasters that rely on Google news to syndicate their content to bring in traffic and returned interest for their niche sites, and it works handsomely for them.

--
The other side to this is that full news sites aren&#039;t really all that good for RSS, or are they? I had a couple of them in my Opera feed reader and after a while it just becomes overwhelm. However, after I swapped them over to widget form in my netvibes account I found that more manageable, and I use netvibes much like a regular newspaper website, except I have feeds coming in from worldwide newspapers. 

--
That&#039;s once instance where RSS works just as it should, to mash-up content from multiple sources into one place for the reader. I can&#039;t say I read everything that comes in, but I sure do visit those sites more often because I visit with purpose, coming from a link that interested me. I think pre-RSS it would&#039;ve been unlikely I&#039;d visit all such news sites once a month, or even remember to do so. RSS pays in the long term. 
-
The decision to turn off RSS by Agence France-Presse (AFP) is nothing short of short-sightedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with the conclusions of this post. I know of a few webmasters that rely on Google news to syndicate their content to bring in traffic and returned interest for their niche sites, and it works handsomely for them.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
The other side to this is that full news sites aren&#8217;t really all that good for RSS, or are they? I had a couple of them in my Opera feed reader and after a while it just becomes overwhelm. However, after I swapped them over to widget form in my netvibes account I found that more manageable, and I use netvibes much like a regular newspaper website, except I have feeds coming in from worldwide newspapers. </p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
That&#8217;s once instance where RSS works just as it should, to mash-up content from multiple sources into one place for the reader. I can&#8217;t say I read everything that comes in, but I sure do visit those sites more often because I visit with purpose, coming from a link that interested me. I think pre-RSS it would&#8217;ve been unlikely I&#8217;d visit all such news sites once a month, or even remember to do so. RSS pays in the long term.<br />
-<br />
The decision to turn off RSS by Agence France-Presse (AFP) is nothing short of short-sightedness.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
