<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building on a Closed Platform?  Tread Carefully</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/20/building-on-a-closed-platform-tread-carefully/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/20/building-on-a-closed-platform-tread-carefully/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:42:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D9r</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/20/building-on-a-closed-platform-tread-carefully/comment-page-1/#comment-852662</link>
		<dc:creator>D9r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3444#comment-852662</guid>
		<description>Steve Poland&#039;s experience is disturbing, but on the other hand isn&#039;t Twitter&#039;s policy of reserving names for trademark owners similar to that used by domain registrars and/or ICANN?

Regarding Newber&#039;s experience, I was excited to hear T-Mobile is using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.android.com/timeline.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;open source Android&lt;/a&gt; on their new G1 cellphones.  I assume that T-Mobile&#039;s use of Android would eliminate the problems Newber is having with Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Poland&#8217;s experience is disturbing, but on the other hand isn&#8217;t Twitter&#8217;s policy of reserving names for trademark owners similar to that used by domain registrars and/or ICANN?</p>
<p>Regarding Newber&#8217;s experience, I was excited to hear T-Mobile is using the <a href="http://www.android.com/timeline.html" rel="nofollow">open source Android</a> on their new G1 cellphones.  I assume that T-Mobile&#8217;s use of Android would eliminate the problems Newber is having with Apple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattymcg</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/20/building-on-a-closed-platform-tread-carefully/comment-page-1/#comment-852618</link>
		<dc:creator>mattymcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3444#comment-852618</guid>
		<description>... nor would your app suddenly stop working if Microsoft went bust, as would have happened if anyone had built apps around Pownce in the way that folks have around Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; nor would your app suddenly stop working if Microsoft went bust, as would have happened if anyone had built apps around Pownce in the way that folks have around Twitter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Catone</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/20/building-on-a-closed-platform-tread-carefully/comment-page-1/#comment-851865</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Catone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3444#comment-851865</guid>
		<description>@sbdi: It is different from developing for a platform like Windows.  Microsoft can&#039;t just turn off or block your app (or it would take a significant technical investment on their part to do so), as Facebook could, nor do they control the sales channel for your application, as Apple does for the iPhone, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sbdi: It is different from developing for a platform like Windows.  Microsoft can&#8217;t just turn off or block your app (or it would take a significant technical investment on their part to do so), as Facebook could, nor do they control the sales channel for your application, as Apple does for the iPhone, for example.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbdi</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/20/building-on-a-closed-platform-tread-carefully/comment-page-1/#comment-851843</link>
		<dc:creator>sbdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3444#comment-851843</guid>
		<description>Nothing new here. While its no different as to the dependency you place on Microsoft at the very least you can build tangiable value through them and their desktop. 

Most of these &#039;Web 2.0&#039; companies with their wonderful API / platforms seem to offer any real business value. Just a nice way of accessing eye balls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new here. While its no different as to the dependency you place on Microsoft at the very least you can build tangiable value through them and their desktop. </p>
<p>Most of these &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; companies with their wonderful API / platforms seem to offer any real business value. Just a nice way of accessing eye balls.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
