<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Leaves Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:10:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Coenn HC Chrome user</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-859535</link>
		<dc:creator>Coenn HC Chrome user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-859535</guid>
		<description>I am addicted to Chrome :O Its just so clear and simple. It has many features and ok, some buggs will come. But when you people say; Why make another webbrowser. I am someone who loves it to test new things. I used all web browsers, for fun! and this is my favorite. I use it 98% for the sites. I use others for sites who dont accept Google chrome, because it is not in the Browser-that-is-accepted list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am addicted to Chrome :O Its just so clear and simple. It has many features and ok, some buggs will come. But when you people say; Why make another webbrowser. I am someone who loves it to test new things. I used all web browsers, for fun! and this is my favorite. I use it 98% for the sites. I use others for sites who dont accept Google chrome, because it is not in the Browser-that-is-accepted list.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-853745</link>
		<dc:creator>James Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-853745</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really see why Chrome has even been made. Surely there are more than enough browsers already, creating yet another seems unnecessary. Perhaps Google are planning to make future developments to compliment Chrome more than other browsers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see why Chrome has even been made. Surely there are more than enough browsers already, creating yet another seems unnecessary. Perhaps Google are planning to make future developments to compliment Chrome more than other browsers?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaBinh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-848694</link>
		<dc:creator>SaBinh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-848694</guid>
		<description>I never heard of Chrome, how long is Chrome been in the internet business? Is Chrome like a web browser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never heard of Chrome, how long is Chrome been in the internet business? Is Chrome like a web browser?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottRadcliff</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-848412</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottRadcliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-848412</guid>
		<description>@croele I agree completely. 

I also use Chrome as my primary browser, and switch to Firefox for development purposes. The latest release of Firefox seems to take forever to load. I see no need to wait for FF to load when I can fire up Chrome and be on my way. But, as has been stated over and over, Chrome needs plugins. When it is able to help me with debugging and other development issues, I&#039;ll probably ditch Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@croele I agree completely. </p>
<p>I also use Chrome as my primary browser, and switch to Firefox for development purposes. The latest release of Firefox seems to take forever to load. I see no need to wait for FF to load when I can fire up Chrome and be on my way. But, as has been stated over and over, Chrome needs plugins. When it is able to help me with debugging and other development issues, I&#8217;ll probably ditch Firefox.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creole</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-847667</link>
		<dc:creator>creole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-847667</guid>
		<description>Chrome has been my primary browser since it came out. It&#039;s fast, loads quick, and does everything a normal user could want. Where it lacks is in developer features. When I need to debug a site, I switch over to Firefox to take advantage of Firebug, and the Web Developer toolbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome has been my primary browser since it came out. It&#8217;s fast, loads quick, and does everything a normal user could want. Where it lacks is in developer features. When I need to debug a site, I switch over to Firefox to take advantage of Firebug, and the Web Developer toolbar.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StylizE</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-847601</link>
		<dc:creator>StylizE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-847601</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is very fast! It&#039;s simple and easy to use, no complicated graphics on the browser. I think it can beat safari browser on loading time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is very fast! It&#8217;s simple and easy to use, no complicated graphics on the browser. I think it can beat safari browser on loading time?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somecallmejosh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-847600</link>
		<dc:creator>somecallmejosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-847600</guid>
		<description>I love the simplicity of Chrome.  The lack of features is what draws me in.  It&#039;s the lack of functionality that has me resorting to Firefox.  Some applications just don&#039;t work in Chrome.  Perhaps its buggy code in the application... perhaps it&#039;s a bug in Chrome.  Not sure.  Anyone have any luck sending email in Hotmail with Chrome?  Doesn&#039;t work for us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the simplicity of Chrome.  The lack of features is what draws me in.  It&#8217;s the lack of functionality that has me resorting to Firefox.  Some applications just don&#8217;t work in Chrome.  Perhaps its buggy code in the application&#8230; perhaps it&#8217;s a bug in Chrome.  Not sure.  Anyone have any luck sending email in Hotmail with Chrome?  Doesn&#8217;t work for us&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waji</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-847594</link>
		<dc:creator>waji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-847594</guid>
		<description>I still use Google Chrome because of the Interface wide and open but many features are missing :( firefox is amazing but they should make the interface a bit better :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use Google Chrome because of the Interface wide and open but many features are missing :( firefox is amazing but they should make the interface a bit better :p</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormrider</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-847562</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-847562</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only real big difference between Google Chrome and the other competitors on the market, is the fact that Chrome’s tabs open in a separate process, avoiding crashing the whole browsers should something drastic happen.&quot;

Amazing technology that has been available since... well, since the first browser that allowed multiple instances really! Even IE6 runs all its windows in a separate process, what&#039;s so special and new about it? Just that all of them are in the same window?

Chrome is missing a LOT of features to be used by me. For one, you can&#039;t even press the middle mouse button down to scroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only real big difference between Google Chrome and the other competitors on the market, is the fact that Chrome’s tabs open in a separate process, avoiding crashing the whole browsers should something drastic happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amazing technology that has been available since&#8230; well, since the first browser that allowed multiple instances really! Even IE6 runs all its windows in a separate process, what&#8217;s so special and new about it? Just that all of them are in the same window?</p>
<p>Chrome is missing a LOT of features to be used by me. For one, you can&#8217;t even press the middle mouse button down to scroll.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.Danials</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/12/google-chrome-leaves-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-847456</link>
		<dc:creator>F.Danials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3267#comment-847456</guid>
		<description>I still see no advantages in changing over to Google Chrome, why re-invent what&#039;s already done.


The only real big difference between Google Chrome and the other competitors on the market, is the fact that Chrome&#039;s tabs open in a separate process, avoiding crashing the whole browsers should something drastic happen.


I&#039;m sure it won&#039;t be long before FireFox (My Favourite) will inherit the same functionality as Chrome, and therefore will prevent users needing to convert to Google&#039;s new browser, in order to utilize this new functionality/feature.

I&#039;m open to anyone&#039;s thoughts ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still see no advantages in changing over to Google Chrome, why re-invent what&#8217;s already done.</p>
<p>The only real big difference between Google Chrome and the other competitors on the market, is the fact that Chrome&#8217;s tabs open in a separate process, avoiding crashing the whole browsers should something drastic happen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it won&#8217;t be long before FireFox (My Favourite) will inherit the same functionality as Chrome, and therefore will prevent users needing to convert to Google&#8217;s new browser, in order to utilize this new functionality/feature.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m open to anyone&#8217;s thoughts ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
