<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Sites for Watching English Evolve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:34:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: macuser</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-844772</link>
		<dc:creator>macuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3223#comment-844772</guid>
		<description>While visiting this page, I stumbled upon an unknown acronym: NSFW, in the article dealing with the Urban Dictionary, of which I am a big fan. Unfortunately, the Urban Dictionary itself doesn&#039;t provide a definition, nor do the others that I have tried so far. My best guess is &quot;Not Suitable For Women&quot; but I find that rather unsatisfactory. Please let me know what NSFW stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While visiting this page, I stumbled upon an unknown acronym: NSFW, in the article dealing with the Urban Dictionary, of which I am a big fan. Unfortunately, the Urban Dictionary itself doesn&#8217;t provide a definition, nor do the others that I have tried so far. My best guess is &#8220;Not Suitable For Women&#8221; but I find that rather unsatisfactory. Please let me know what NSFW stands for.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roosevelt</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-841172</link>
		<dc:creator>roosevelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3223#comment-841172</guid>
		<description>haha, interesting websites indeed :).

Cankle made my day :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, interesting websites indeed :).</p>
<p>Cankle made my day :p</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-840697</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3223#comment-840697</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed your post. These sites would be helpful for the students, the readers and the one&#039;s who loves the english language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your post. These sites would be helpful for the students, the readers and the one&#8217;s who loves the english language.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Yank</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-839963</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3223#comment-839963</guid>
		<description>I quite enjoy the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;grammarphobia blog&lt;/a&gt;. Author Patricia T. O‘Conner answers readers’ questions about the squirrelly bits of the English language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite enjoy the <a href="http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">grammarphobia blog</a>. Author Patricia T. O‘Conner answers readers’ questions about the squirrelly bits of the English language.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/27/8-sites-for-watching-english-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-839943</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3223#comment-839943</guid>
		<description>Actually, the &quot;ask/aks&quot; variation has been happening in English for at least a thousand years. Grab any old English dictionary and you&#039;ll find the two verbs acsian and ascian as definitions for &quot;to ask.&quot; It turns out this was a  a regional dialect difference between the north and the south of England. Today, we tend to think of this as a socioeconomic dialect difference--with non-standard speakers employing &quot;axe.&quot; Futurama isn&#039;t far off the mark, but with variation that&#039;s been stable for at least a thousand years, there&#039;s no reason to predict that in the year 3000 &quot;axe&quot; will replace &quot;ask.&quot; But it&#039;s certainly not impossible, given the way variation leads to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the &#8220;ask/aks&#8221; variation has been happening in English for at least a thousand years. Grab any old English dictionary and you&#8217;ll find the two verbs acsian and ascian as definitions for &#8220;to ask.&#8221; It turns out this was a  a regional dialect difference between the north and the south of England. Today, we tend to think of this as a socioeconomic dialect difference&#8211;with non-standard speakers employing &#8220;axe.&#8221; Futurama isn&#8217;t far off the mark, but with variation that&#8217;s been stable for at least a thousand years, there&#8217;s no reason to predict that in the year 3000 &#8220;axe&#8221; will replace &#8220;ask.&#8221; But it&#8217;s certainly not impossible, given the way variation leads to change.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
