<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Twitter Charges, Users Would Pay: Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-856941</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-856941</guid>
		<description>twittr is the most boreing and rediculous thing on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twittr is the most boreing and rediculous thing on the internet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eelcoh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-838320</link>
		<dc:creator>eelcoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-838320</guid>
		<description>The question should not be whether the current user base would pay, it should be whether it would be possible to attract new users if these have to pay for the service. I think not. And let&#039;s face it, Twitter might be popular in some circles, but it is nowhere near mainstream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question should not be whether the current user base would pay, it should be whether it would be possible to attract new users if these have to pay for the service. I think not. And let&#8217;s face it, Twitter might be popular in some circles, but it is nowhere near mainstream.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insidious the Walrus</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836469</link>
		<dc:creator>Insidious the Walrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836469</guid>
		<description>If Twitter starts charging individual users, I could see a domino effect happening.  A handful of users would opt out, encouraging users in their networks to opt out, too, since they can no longer communicate.  And so on, and so forth.  All in all, I can&#039;t imagine it would be a good decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Twitter starts charging individual users, I could see a domino effect happening.  A handful of users would opt out, encouraging users in their networks to opt out, too, since they can no longer communicate.  And so on, and so forth.  All in all, I can&#8217;t imagine it would be a good decision.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836246</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836246</guid>
		<description>I have never even been to that website, but if it is just another social site, when they start charging people will just leave for the free sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never even been to that website, but if it is just another social site, when they start charging people will just leave for the free sites.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anaman</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836231</link>
		<dc:creator>anaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836231</guid>
		<description>i would never pay them. most ppl who have a lot of friends would rather setup their own laconica sites to handle their own twitter like communications.
twitter is overloaded with completely random conversations. smaller specialised twitter sites are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would never pay them. most ppl who have a lot of friends would rather setup their own laconica sites to handle their own twitter like communications.<br />
twitter is overloaded with completely random conversations. smaller specialised twitter sites are needed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KamenLee</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836227</link>
		<dc:creator>KamenLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836227</guid>
		<description>I already have one foot out the door anyway, no way in heck I would pay for Twitter... Go ahead and do inline ads like Facebook or sidebar ads like Digg, but if you charge for the service, expect to lose more than 80% of the user base.

Saying Twitter is worth $5 a month and actually paying for it are two very different things.

Twitter: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/kamenlee&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@kamenlee&lt;/a&gt;
Web: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kamenlee.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.kamenlee.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already have one foot out the door anyway, no way in heck I would pay for Twitter&#8230; Go ahead and do inline ads like Facebook or sidebar ads like Digg, but if you charge for the service, expect to lose more than 80% of the user base.</p>
<p>Saying Twitter is worth $5 a month and actually paying for it are two very different things.</p>
<p>Twitter: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/kamenlee" rel="nofollow">@kamenlee</a><br />
Web: <a href="http://www.kamenlee.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kamenlee.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836226</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836226</guid>
		<description>Pay? No way - not when there are other alternatives out there...

I would pay if there was an extra level of services on top of the current ones that made it worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay? No way &#8211; not when there are other alternatives out there&#8230;</p>
<p>I would pay if there was an extra level of services on top of the current ones that made it worthwhile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABM</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836220</link>
		<dc:creator>ABM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836220</guid>
		<description>Free to the user means advertising to offset the cost. Pay equals minimal to no advertising to offset the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free to the user means advertising to offset the cost. Pay equals minimal to no advertising to offset the cost.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836213</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836213</guid>
		<description>@antiquerze

And how do users get serious? By trying it out. If the &quot;casual user&quot; is forced to pay, Twitter is going to see a massive decrease in in new membership, which will definitely prevent Twitter from going to the &quot;next level.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@antiquerze</p>
<p>And how do users get serious? By trying it out. If the &#8220;casual user&#8221; is forced to pay, Twitter is going to see a massive decrease in in new membership, which will definitely prevent Twitter from going to the &#8220;next level.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/20/if-twitter-charges-users-would-pay-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-836189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3204#comment-836189</guid>
		<description>I would pay if it were something like $1 per month. Just charge $12 per year and it would be fair to me. If everyone paid it, Twitter should be able to easily pay for its running costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would pay if it were something like $1 per month. Just charge $12 per year and it would be fair to me. If everyone paid it, Twitter should be able to easily pay for its running costs.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
