<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Docs Use: Just a Blip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:10:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-835643</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-835643</guid>
		<description>@somecallmejosh and @jcallas
 
I share your concerns. For now. But we &quot;gotta stop living in the past man&quot;. ;) It won&#039;t be too long before Internet speed and connection problems will become non-issues and security will be close to airtight (at least in developed nations). Remember the first days of e-commerce? People were scared, hesitant and untrusting. Today most of us don&#039;t think twice when placing an online order. The point is, if it makes sense from the service provider&#039;s point of view to move to web-based tools and the benefits are passed on to consumers, it may very well become the natural way to do things, and Google and other providers maybe very well be ahead of the curve in that sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@somecallmejosh and @jcallas</p>
<p>I share your concerns. For now. But we &#8220;gotta stop living in the past man&#8221;. ;) It won&#8217;t be too long before Internet speed and connection problems will become non-issues and security will be close to airtight (at least in developed nations). Remember the first days of e-commerce? People were scared, hesitant and untrusting. Today most of us don&#8217;t think twice when placing an online order. The point is, if it makes sense from the service provider&#8217;s point of view to move to web-based tools and the benefits are passed on to consumers, it may very well become the natural way to do things, and Google and other providers maybe very well be ahead of the curve in that sense.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somecallmejosh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-835295</link>
		<dc:creator>somecallmejosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-835295</guid>
		<description>@jcallas

I agree with this.  Considering my company to be virtual, internet is required regardless.  Whether VPN, or through some other means of accessing the remote server, I&#039;m still dependent on an internet connection.  A redundant internet connection is definitely called for in remote document/data/etc. storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jcallas</p>
<p>I agree with this.  Considering my company to be virtual, internet is required regardless.  Whether VPN, or through some other means of accessing the remote server, I&#8217;m still dependent on an internet connection.  A redundant internet connection is definitely called for in remote document/data/etc. storage.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-835144</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-835144</guid>
		<description>But as web apps become more robust and secure and Internet connectivity and speed become non-issues, won&#039;t web-based tools become more popular? Especially if free.

Isn&#039;t it fair to assume that Google is content right now being there ahead of the rest of em? Just testing things out and slowly building it&#039;s user base. We&#039;re hearing about the upcoming Windows 7 and &quot;cloud computing&quot; whereby their will be a shift, or at least an attempt to move from desktop applications to apps/services that reside online. So &quot;just a blip&quot; right now, sure. Because most of us are not ready yet for this &#039;bold new era&#039; of computing. But still a blip ahead of the curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as web apps become more robust and secure and Internet connectivity and speed become non-issues, won&#8217;t web-based tools become more popular? Especially if free.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it fair to assume that Google is content right now being there ahead of the rest of em? Just testing things out and slowly building it&#8217;s user base. We&#8217;re hearing about the upcoming Windows 7 and &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; whereby their will be a shift, or at least an attempt to move from desktop applications to apps/services that reside online. So &#8220;just a blip&#8221; right now, sure. Because most of us are not ready yet for this &#8216;bold new era&#8217; of computing. But still a blip ahead of the curve.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcallas</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-834477</link>
		<dc:creator>jcallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-834477</guid>
		<description>In my opinion people just do not want to load/store docs at a third party site. Think this applies no matter what product is being used. Internet connections go down and while it usually sucks not to be connected, at least with local application and storage I am not completely out for the count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion people just do not want to load/store docs at a third party site. Think this applies no matter what product is being used. Internet connections go down and while it usually sucks not to be connected, at least with local application and storage I am not completely out for the count.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somecallmejosh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-831049</link>
		<dc:creator>somecallmejosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-831049</guid>
		<description>We are a Google Apps shop, and Google Docs is the weakest tool in the chest.  Conceptually it&#039;s a great idea, but in practice there are too many limitations.  Our font set isn&#039;t supported, and we cannot embed our stationary templates into the system... 

Also, we cannot share &quot;Directories&quot; inside the Google Docs framework.  This is a major drawback... meaning we would have to manually share every single document.  Can you say &quot;pain in the butt?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are a Google Apps shop, and Google Docs is the weakest tool in the chest.  Conceptually it&#8217;s a great idea, but in practice there are too many limitations.  Our font set isn&#8217;t supported, and we cannot embed our stationary templates into the system&#8230; </p>
<p>Also, we cannot share &#8220;Directories&#8221; inside the Google Docs framework.  This is a major drawback&#8230; meaning we would have to manually share every single document.  Can you say &#8220;pain in the butt?&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boen_robot</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-830671</link>
		<dc:creator>boen_robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-830671</guid>
		<description>Google have the money and the people. Can&#039;t they just create their own branded version of OpenOffice which integrates with Google Docs? It wouldn&#039;t be the first time they&#039;ve done something like this. Look at Chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google have the money and the people. Can&#8217;t they just create their own branded version of OpenOffice which integrates with Google Docs? It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time they&#8217;ve done something like this. Look at Chrome.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-829989</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-829989</guid>
		<description>agree with above. The hype is there, but heck, its never going to be able to compete with the mighty ms office, that suite is sweet. Office for mac 2008, love it! MS could/should just integrate this with the web a bit more and that would be that. The web (javascript) just isnt designed for making these large complex apps, you can argue that the new bytecode js compilers for the next gen browsers will change, but na, keep the desktop apps I say, just integrate with the web more, save docs online, access online etc in a FREE easy way like apple does).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree with above. The hype is there, but heck, its never going to be able to compete with the mighty ms office, that suite is sweet. Office for mac 2008, love it! MS could/should just integrate this with the web a bit more and that would be that. The web (javascript) just isnt designed for making these large complex apps, you can argue that the new bytecode js compilers for the next gen browsers will change, but na, keep the desktop apps I say, just integrate with the web more, save docs online, access online etc in a FREE easy way like apple does).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-828568</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-828568</guid>
		<description>If you have actually &lt;em&gt;used&lt;/em&gt; Google docs for writing a project you will quickly realize it is worthless for 80% of people.

Yes it is handy for a quick and dirty document, but it&#039;s formatting capacity is terrible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have actually <em>used</em> Google docs for writing a project you will quickly realize it is worthless for 80% of people.</p>
<p>Yes it is handy for a quick and dirty document, but it&#8217;s formatting capacity is terrible!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joaquin_win</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/11/15/google-docs-use-just-a-blip/comment-page-1/#comment-828119</link>
		<dc:creator>joaquin_win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3189#comment-828119</guid>
		<description>Probably the possibility to export from Office to Office online will be one of this factors that will make users switch from Google Docs.

Google has to market its doc suite more aggressively, maybe through mobile apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the possibility to export from Office to Office online will be one of this factors that will make users switch from Google Docs.</p>
<p>Google has to market its doc suite more aggressively, maybe through mobile apps.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
