<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POWDER &#8211; A More Personal, Trustworthy Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Антон</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/comment-page-1/#comment-848069</link>
		<dc:creator>Антон</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3058#comment-848069</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Недвижимость в деталях...&lt;/strong&gt;

При этом самая убогая однокомнатная стоит уже 140 тысяч (SitePoint  POWDER - A More Personal, Trustworthy Web)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Недвижимость в деталях&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>При этом самая убогая однокомнатная стоит уже 140 тысяч (SitePoint  POWDER &#8211; A More Personal, Trustworthy Web)&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/comment-page-1/#comment-806762</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3058#comment-806762</guid>
		<description>Looks very interesting indeed - even to connect to somebody in a social network protocol sense (stygma) - for the majority of ppl, is to have met them. If I can make trivial connections without the social attachment of having to maintain or manage the realtionship, or even pass a very human credibility check - for one off collaborations based on similar interests of content - kabam, now that&#039;s a connected web :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks very interesting indeed &#8211; even to connect to somebody in a social network protocol sense (stygma) &#8211; for the majority of ppl, is to have met them. If I can make trivial connections without the social attachment of having to maintain or manage the realtionship, or even pass a very human credibility check &#8211; for one off collaborations based on similar interests of content &#8211; kabam, now that&#8217;s a connected web :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hammonds</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/comment-page-1/#comment-806379</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hammonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3058#comment-806379</guid>
		<description>David,

Great article on POWDER. Prior to reading it I hadn&#039;t even heard
of RDFa, but now I&#039;m very excited about both of these
technologies as they seem to make a truly semantic web imminently
achievable.

In addition to your article, I also read the RDFa Primer from the
W3C, but I&#039;m still having a bit of trouble understanding how
POWDER and RDFa work together. Is POWDER just another vocabulary
set that RDFa can use, much like dc and feof? Or is it something
completely different?

I apologize in advance for my ignorance of microformats, but
would greatly appreciate any enlightenment you can offer!

Best,
Mark H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Great article on POWDER. Prior to reading it I hadn&#8217;t even heard<br />
of RDFa, but now I&#8217;m very excited about both of these<br />
technologies as they seem to make a truly semantic web imminently<br />
achievable.</p>
<p>In addition to your article, I also read the RDFa Primer from the<br />
W3C, but I&#8217;m still having a bit of trouble understanding how<br />
POWDER and RDFa work together. Is POWDER just another vocabulary<br />
set that RDFa can use, much like dc and feof? Or is it something<br />
completely different?</p>
<p>I apologize in advance for my ignorance of microformats, but<br />
would greatly appreciate any enlightenment you can offer!</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Mark H.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david.seth.p</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/comment-page-1/#comment-805641</link>
		<dc:creator>david.seth.p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3058#comment-805641</guid>
		<description>@meitar I see this giving SEO people a whole playground. Instead of using structured, semantic HTML and possibly some dodgy tricks, web sites can start to emit structured data. They don&#039;t have to open up the piggy bank, but just a little structured metadata will go a long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@meitar I see this giving SEO people a whole playground. Instead of using structured, semantic HTML and possibly some dodgy tricks, web sites can start to emit structured data. They don&#8217;t have to open up the piggy bank, but just a little structured metadata will go a long way.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meitar</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/10/08/powder-more-personal-more-trustworthy-web/comment-page-1/#comment-805538</link>
		<dc:creator>meitar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=3058#comment-805538</guid>
		<description>This sounds very much like a move to compete with the recent launch of Ask.com&#039;s &quot;river of rich media&quot; search results, where Ask.com gives you TV listings when you search for &quot;Martha Stewart&quot; (for example) because the search engine knows that &quot;Martha Stewart&quot; is a person and that she has a TV show with event times.

Or perhaps Ask.com&#039;s recent &quot;massive search improvements&quot; a response to Yahoo!&#039;s initiative? Ars Technica recently posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081006-ask-com-rearms-with-semantics-rich-media-in-search-war.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a fascinating piece about that&lt;/a&gt;.

Either way, it sounds like Semantic Web and SEO advocates are destined to spend additional time in a love-hate relationship thanks to brewing perfect storm in the search engine world. I think that&#039;s a good thing. What&#039;s a little love without a little hate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds very much like a move to compete with the recent launch of Ask.com&#8217;s &#8220;river of rich media&#8221; search results, where Ask.com gives you TV listings when you search for &#8220;Martha Stewart&#8221; (for example) because the search engine knows that &#8220;Martha Stewart&#8221; is a person and that she has a TV show with event times.</p>
<p>Or perhaps Ask.com&#8217;s recent &#8220;massive search improvements&#8221; a response to Yahoo!&#8217;s initiative? Ars Technica recently posted <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081006-ask-com-rearms-with-semantics-rich-media-in-search-war.html" rel="nofollow">a fascinating piece about that</a>.</p>
<p>Either way, it sounds like Semantic Web and SEO advocates are destined to spend additional time in a love-hate relationship thanks to brewing perfect storm in the search engine world. I think that&#8217;s a good thing. What&#8217;s a little love without a little hate?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
