<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easy Vector Graphics with the Raphaël JavaScript Library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:39:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-795131</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2926#comment-795131</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure whether this is a comment about the library or browser support for the library but...

The demo works seamlessly in FireFox, Safari and Google&#039;s Chrome, but IE8 reports invalid JavaScript unless I tell it to work in &quot;compatibility mode&quot; (emulating IE7).

It appears IE8&#039;s default &quot;standards mode&quot; is still out of step with the other browsers? :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether this is a comment about the library or browser support for the library but&#8230;</p>
<p>The demo works seamlessly in FireFox, Safari and Google&#8217;s Chrome, but IE8 reports invalid JavaScript unless I tell it to work in &#8220;compatibility mode&#8221; (emulating IE7).</p>
<p>It appears IE8&#8217;s default &#8220;standards mode&#8221; is still out of step with the other browsers? :(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-793218</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2926#comment-793218</guid>
		<description>How about a more realistic demo?

This example &lt;em&gt;really &lt;/em&gt;needs an abstraction layer, so much so that it is almost impossible to digest how good or bad this thing is as a graphics library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a more realistic demo?</p>
<p>This example <em>really </em>needs an abstraction layer, so much so that it is almost impossible to digest how good or bad this thing is as a graphics library.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brothercake</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-791592</link>
		<dc:creator>brothercake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2926#comment-791592</guid>
		<description>Oh I meant this one actually, but the other one is still interesting -- http://www.sitepoint.com/article/ajax-screenreaders-work/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I meant this one actually, but the other one is still interesting &#8212; <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/article/ajax-screenreaders-work/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/article/ajax-screenreaders-work/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brothercake</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-791591</link>
		<dc:creator>brothercake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2926#comment-791591</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no way to update page content via Ajax and remain accessible. Not if you&#039;re being realistic.

But then I suppose it depends on your benchmark. It depends whether you count JS support as an accessibility issue (I do; many don&#039;t), and whether you can presume that a screenreader user is using the latest and greatest version (which may support ARIA, where older ones don&#039;t).

ARIA = Accessible Rich Internet Applications (to me, an oxymoron if ever there was one; but I&#039;m not gonna get into that here -- have a look at some of this for more: 

http://www.alistapart.com/articles/waiaria (thinks it&#039;s cool)
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accessible-javascript/ (not at all convinced .. actually I wrote that one, just so you know where the bias is coming from ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no way to update page content via Ajax and remain accessible. Not if you&#8217;re being realistic.</p>
<p>But then I suppose it depends on your benchmark. It depends whether you count JS support as an accessibility issue (I do; many don&#8217;t), and whether you can presume that a screenreader user is using the latest and greatest version (which may support ARIA, where older ones don&#8217;t).</p>
<p>ARIA = Accessible Rich Internet Applications (to me, an oxymoron if ever there was one; but I&#8217;m not gonna get into that here &#8212; have a look at some of this for more: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/waiaria" rel="nofollow">http://www.alistapart.com/articles/waiaria</a> (thinks it&#8217;s cool)<br />
<a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accessible-javascript/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/article/accessible-javascript/</a> (not at all convinced .. actually I wrote that one, just so you know where the bias is coming from ;))</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Tetlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-791074</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Tetlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2926#comment-791074</guid>
		<description>Well the library is purely for the creation of vector graphics, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the responsibility of this library. In the demo, I&#039;ve updated the heading of the graph, a h1 element, with the current performance value each time the graph updates. No reason why the heading couldn&#039;t have the initial value on page load.

But, what&#039;s the best way to update page content via Ajax and remain accessible?

I guess, you could also have a manual refresh control, that grabs the latest perf data (since last update) and then produces a static graph from the data in the HTML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the library is purely for the creation of vector graphics, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the responsibility of this library. In the demo, I&#8217;ve updated the heading of the graph, a h1 element, with the current performance value each time the graph updates. No reason why the heading couldn&#8217;t have the initial value on page load.</p>
<p>But, what&#8217;s the best way to update page content via Ajax and remain accessible?</p>
<p>I guess, you could also have a manual refresh control, that grabs the latest perf data (since last update) and then produces a static graph from the data in the HTML.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brothercake</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/09/03/easy-vector-graphics-with-the-raphael-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-791069</link>
		<dc:creator>brothercake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2926#comment-791069</guid>
		<description>Does the data have to be written in script, or does the library have the capability to extract its data from existing HTML? If it&#039;s pure JS there&#039;s no fallback content for assistive devices to interpret, or for non-scrip users to see, therefore no legitimate way of using it at all (without adding that layer yourself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the data have to be written in script, or does the library have the capability to extract its data from existing HTML? If it&#8217;s pure JS there&#8217;s no fallback content for assistive devices to interpret, or for non-scrip users to see, therefore no legitimate way of using it at all (without adding that layer yourself).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
