<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo!: Web 3.0 is All About Desktop RIAs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jobol</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/comment-page-1/#comment-774570</link>
		<dc:creator>jobol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2744#comment-774570</guid>
		<description>Browser extensions can play an important niche role in pushing web standards forward, but are they important enough to deserve a Web 3.0 label? I&#039;m not so sure. I wrote this post about a few other &lt;a href=&quot;http://impl.emented.com/2008/08/04/the-return-of-web-30-cloud-computing-browser-extensions-or-the-distributed-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent Web 3.0 proposals&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browser extensions can play an important niche role in pushing web standards forward, but are they important enough to deserve a Web 3.0 label? I&#8217;m not so sure. I wrote this post about a few other <a href="http://impl.emented.com/2008/08/04/the-return-of-web-30-cloud-computing-browser-extensions-or-the-distributed-web/" rel="nofollow">recent Web 3.0 proposals</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattt Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/comment-page-1/#comment-772272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattt Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2744#comment-772272</guid>
		<description>@stuartk Right now, I have a strong, but loosely held opinion about AIR. It seems to me that AIR is approaching desktop integration from the wrong direction. It falls somewhere between OS widgets / gadgets and real web applications, with none of the advantages. I just don&#039;t see users being motivated enough to go through such an extensive installation process to try out something not much different than a widget or a normal website.

What I&#039;ve found to be much more interesting is the approach that Mozilla Prism and Fluid are doing by leveraging existing rendering engines to easily port heavily-used applications to specific applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stuartk Right now, I have a strong, but loosely held opinion about AIR. It seems to me that AIR is approaching desktop integration from the wrong direction. It falls somewhere between OS widgets / gadgets and real web applications, with none of the advantages. I just don&#8217;t see users being motivated enough to go through such an extensive installation process to try out something not much different than a widget or a normal website.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve found to be much more interesting is the approach that Mozilla Prism and Fluid are doing by leveraging existing rendering engines to easily port heavily-used applications to specific applications.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuartk</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/comment-page-1/#comment-771663</link>
		<dc:creator>stuartk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2744#comment-771663</guid>
		<description>@Matt, just wondering how you think Adobe Air fits into this picture.  Although it&#039;s not Open, it does allow a transition from web 2.0 to RIA&#039;s, as I believe you can use html, flash or flex to develop with Air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt, just wondering how you think Adobe Air fits into this picture.  Although it&#8217;s not Open, it does allow a transition from web 2.0 to RIA&#8217;s, as I believe you can use html, flash or flex to develop with Air.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattt Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/comment-page-1/#comment-771638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattt Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2744#comment-771638</guid>
		<description>@rickmans As I wrote in my article, Gears was released as open-source in May. Unlike the browser wars of the 90&#039;s, Gears is positioning itself as an extension of existing web standards, ie HTML5. The modular approach of BrowserPlus, however, does not easily lend itself to a completely open-source implementation as it necessitates a gatekeeper of sorts. However, Yahoo! and the BrowserPlus team are doing their best to open up the process as much as they can, without compromising security to users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rickmans As I wrote in my article, Gears was released as open-source in May. Unlike the browser wars of the 90&#8217;s, Gears is positioning itself as an extension of existing web standards, ie HTML5. The modular approach of BrowserPlus, however, does not easily lend itself to a completely open-source implementation as it necessitates a gatekeeper of sorts. However, Yahoo! and the BrowserPlus team are doing their best to open up the process as much as they can, without compromising security to users.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickmans</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/31/yahoo-web-30-is-all-about-offline-rias/comment-page-1/#comment-771487</link>
		<dc:creator>rickmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2744#comment-771487</guid>
		<description>Well a vendor lock-in, that a new approach. Finally we were finished with the heritage of IE&#039;s  and now we get plugins that do not differ that much. Are there any open alternatives for these two plugins?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well a vendor lock-in, that a new approach. Finally we were finished with the heritage of IE&#8217;s  and now we get plugins that do not differ that much. Are there any open alternatives for these two plugins?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
