<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don’t Get Burned When the Cloud Goes Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/22/dont-get-burned-when-the-cloud-goes-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/22/dont-get-burned-when-the-cloud-goes-down/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:18:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mingz</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/22/dont-get-burned-when-the-cloud-goes-down/comment-page-1/#comment-766033</link>
		<dc:creator>mingz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2677#comment-766033</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to remind project managers the importance of risk management. If you don&#039;t manage risk, you are risking your business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to remind project managers the importance of risk management. If you don&#8217;t manage risk, you are risking your business.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdog</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/22/dont-get-burned-when-the-cloud-goes-down/comment-page-1/#comment-765010</link>
		<dc:creator>gdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2677#comment-765010</guid>
		<description>@Tjis: Totally correct. 

I am considering moving some corporate functionality in the near-future to EC/S3 because I expect it to me more reliable than hosting my own boxes. I would expect it to be built out such that downtimes are infinitely less likely than me slapping a few boxes into geographically-disperse data centers. 

But, why bother if I can do better? Apart from scaling-for-spikes, I have had 99.999% uptime in the last year. Apparently , I have better uptime and redundancy than Amazon for not that much more a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tjis: Totally correct. </p>
<p>I am considering moving some corporate functionality in the near-future to EC/S3 because I expect it to me more reliable than hosting my own boxes. I would expect it to be built out such that downtimes are infinitely less likely than me slapping a few boxes into geographically-disperse data centers. </p>
<p>But, why bother if I can do better? Apart from scaling-for-spikes, I have had 99.999% uptime in the last year. Apparently , I have better uptime and redundancy than Amazon for not that much more a month.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tijs</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/22/dont-get-burned-when-the-cloud-goes-down/comment-page-1/#comment-764928</link>
		<dc:creator>Tijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2677#comment-764928</guid>
		<description>For many services it&#039;s the cost of storage that makes S3 attractive. keeping a backup of all S3 data on &#039;expensive&#039; alternatives sort of defies the purpose. what we need is an S3 competitor. I would love to be able to keep backups in the google cloud and switch to either depending on availability. Since both EU and US S3 services were down i guess keeping your data on both isn&#039;t a solution in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many services it&#8217;s the cost of storage that makes S3 attractive. keeping a backup of all S3 data on &#8216;expensive&#8217; alternatives sort of defies the purpose. what we need is an S3 competitor. I would love to be able to keep backups in the google cloud and switch to either depending on availability. Since both EU and US S3 services were down i guess keeping your data on both isn&#8217;t a solution in this case.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
