<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SproutCore: JavaScript Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: We Should be like MSoft</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-755970</link>
		<dc:creator>We Should be like MSoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-755970</guid>
		<description>Hmm,
I realize that most of you guys comment on IE6 Support. Heck I suggest all web developers to kill IE6 support cause MS release new OS that require the whole world to upgrade their PC. So why should we be nice to Microsoft users by supporting an outdated browser?

Yeah, my statement is confusing, but think of it this way, Microsoft forces its customers to upgrade to their new OS by killing of support of their previous OS, so its the same if we kill of IE6 users by forcing them to upgrade to IE7 if they want to use our website or make a popup which says get Firefox and never have to worry about browser incompatibility ever again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm,<br />
I realize that most of you guys comment on IE6 Support. Heck I suggest all web developers to kill IE6 support cause MS release new OS that require the whole world to upgrade their PC. So why should we be nice to Microsoft users by supporting an outdated browser?</p>
<p>Yeah, my statement is confusing, but think of it this way, Microsoft forces its customers to upgrade to their new OS by killing of support of their previous OS, so its the same if we kill of IE6 users by forcing them to upgrade to IE7 if they want to use our website or make a popup which says get Firefox and never have to worry about browser incompatibility ever again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heggaton</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-753703</link>
		<dc:creator>heggaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-753703</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t care about IE6 or 7&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good luck keeping customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t care about IE6 or 7</p></blockquote>
<p>Good luck keeping customers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaForce</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-753526</link>
		<dc:creator>LaForce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-753526</guid>
		<description>SproutCore is definitely the direction to go. I don't care about IE6 or 7. Why bother my customers with the past, iinstead of make them happy with the future. And Sproutcore (and Ruby) take away so much development pain - they're just amazing....

Opposed to what was said before, allowing for clean semantic code is the strength of Sproutcore and Ruby. Hiding unnecessary, repeating and redundant code from the developer is the way to go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SproutCore is definitely the direction to go. I don&#8217;t care about IE6 or 7. Why bother my customers with the past, iinstead of make them happy with the future. And Sproutcore (and Ruby) take away so much development pain - they&#8217;re just amazing&#8230;.</p>
<p>Opposed to what was said before, allowing for clean semantic code is the strength of Sproutcore and Ruby. Hiding unnecessary, repeating and redundant code from the developer is the way to go&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atetlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-753022</link>
		<dc:creator>atetlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-753022</guid>
		<description>Even though the demo is crappy, the point was not just to show how to get a message to display, but how bindings/observers work.

@Johans the controller never really updates the view. The controller updates a stored value and that's all. The label_view element just happens to be bound to that value, but the controller is unaware of that.

That's what I was trying to demonstrate -- the wiring up of interface elements without having to write any DOM manipulation code. I thought it was pretty neat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the demo is crappy, the point was not just to show how to get a message to display, but how bindings/observers work.</p>
<p>@Johans the controller never really updates the view. The controller updates a stored value and that&#8217;s all. The label_view element just happens to be bound to that value, but the controller is unaware of that.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I was trying to demonstrate &#8212; the wiring up of interface elements without having to write any DOM manipulation code. I thought it was pretty neat.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grrrr</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-751532</link>
		<dc:creator>grrrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-751532</guid>
		<description>As somebody who has some experience with GUI programming before doing web programming it seems to me like web programmers do not really know what MVC is . For example if you think rails is a MVC framework you are wrong. On the other hand sproutcore looks like it really is a MVC framework and it includes some concepts that are fundamental to MVC that are missing in for example rails and that some commenter's here do not seem to grasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As somebody who has some experience with GUI programming before doing web programming it seems to me like web programmers do not really know what MVC is . For example if you think rails is a MVC framework you are wrong. On the other hand sproutcore looks like it really is a MVC framework and it includes some concepts that are fundamental to MVC that are missing in for example rails and that some commenter&#8217;s here do not seem to grasp.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heggaton</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-751496</link>
		<dc:creator>heggaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-751496</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Because it doens’t work in IE” is a terrible reason not to use it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why? Why should we as developers handicap our business by telling our clients that we're not going to support one of the most used browsers out there?

Sounds like a good way to kill a business personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Because it doens’t work in IE” is a terrible reason not to use it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why? Why should we as developers handicap our business by telling our clients that we&#8217;re not going to support one of the most used browsers out there?</p>
<p>Sounds like a good way to kill a business personally.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-751431</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-751431</guid>
		<description>@Johans

&#62;The demo is badly designed since the Controller updates the View - the view should be bound to the Model.

Er, that's the whole point of the Controller in MVC, to synchronize data between the view and model.

@everyone else

"Because it doens't work in IE" is a terrible reason not to use it.  Let's push the state-of-the-art, not wallow in the status-quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Johans</p>
<p>&gt;The demo is badly designed since the Controller updates the View - the view should be bound to the Model.</p>
<p>Er, that&#8217;s the whole point of the Controller in MVC, to synchronize data between the view and model.</p>
<p>@everyone else</p>
<p>&#8220;Because it doens&#8217;t work in IE&#8221; is a terrible reason not to use it.  Let&#8217;s push the state-of-the-art, not wallow in the status-quo.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heggaton</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-751429</link>
		<dc:creator>heggaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-751429</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;there is no way I am chaining myself to IE6 for another 2 years waiting for System 7 to come out and people start upgrading.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And there is no way anyone will use your framework until it supports IE6 or the years pass and no one uses IE6 any more.

Get your head out of the sand! This isn't a developer request. If developers had their way, they'd all use the very latest technology. It's the users - a market which can't be controlled.

As long as users are using IE6, developers will (have to) support it. I can't see any framework being successful when it dictates that it can't be used on one of the most popular browsers out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>there is no way I am chaining myself to IE6 for another 2 years waiting for System 7 to come out and people start upgrading.</p></blockquote>
<p>And there is no way anyone will use your framework until it supports IE6 or the years pass and no one uses IE6 any more.</p>
<p>Get your head out of the sand! This isn&#8217;t a developer request. If developers had their way, they&#8217;d all use the very latest technology. It&#8217;s the users - a market which can&#8217;t be controlled.</p>
<p>As long as users are using IE6, developers will (have to) support it. I can&#8217;t see any framework being successful when it dictates that it can&#8217;t be used on one of the most popular browsers out there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMedia</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-751411</link>
		<dc:creator>GMedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-751411</guid>
		<description>SproutCore is revolutionary - a game changing framework for the web. Write your code in Ruby/HTML/JS then compile it for distribution. There are a bunch of flaws and faults, but it is a young framework. I see it as the leader for tomorrow, but still in training.

It seems a lot of web programmers are missing the point, because this isn't your grandma's web programming. This is application design. Once there is a good IDE for this (please please Apple make me something in xcode with Interface Designer) we will see an explosion in great web apps.

As far as support for IE goes - I have had to drop it for one project that needs IE 6 support, but I have another app where people are going to drop IE6 to use it... It's time for the web to grow up - there is no way I am chaining myself to IE6 for another 2 years waiting for System 7 to come out and people start upgrading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SproutCore is revolutionary - a game changing framework for the web. Write your code in Ruby/HTML/JS then compile it for distribution. There are a bunch of flaws and faults, but it is a young framework. I see it as the leader for tomorrow, but still in training.</p>
<p>It seems a lot of web programmers are missing the point, because this isn&#8217;t your grandma&#8217;s web programming. This is application design. Once there is a good IDE for this (please please Apple make me something in xcode with Interface Designer) we will see an explosion in great web apps.</p>
<p>As far as support for IE goes - I have had to drop it for one project that needs IE 6 support, but I have another app where people are going to drop IE6 to use it&#8230; It&#8217;s time for the web to grow up - there is no way I am chaining myself to IE6 for another 2 years waiting for System 7 to come out and people start upgrading.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johans</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/25/sproutcore-javascript-applications/#comment-750815</link>
		<dc:creator>Johans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2578#comment-750815</guid>
		<description>Have to agree that that is hardly appealing code and certainly no way it gets close to what you can do in Adobe Flex/Air. 

The demo is badly designed since the Controller updates the View - the view should be bound to the Model. 

As for not working in MSIE - do I really want to spend my time doing cross-browser testing when I could be workgin on the application? Not me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree that that is hardly appealing code and certainly no way it gets close to what you can do in Adobe Flex/Air. </p>
<p>The demo is badly designed since the Controller updates the View - the view should be bound to the Model. </p>
<p>As for not working in MSIE - do I really want to spend my time doing cross-browser testing when I could be workgin on the application? Not me!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
