<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Week in ColdFusion: 4 &#8211; 10 June: More details on Railo open source and just a little bit of controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/14/the-week-in-coldfusion-4-10-june-more-details-on-railo-open-source-and-just-a-little-bit-of-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/14/the-week-in-coldfusion-4-10-june-more-details-on-railo-open-source-and-just-a-little-bit-of-controversy/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:09:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ethyreal</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/14/the-week-in-coldfusion-4-10-june-more-details-on-railo-open-source-and-just-a-little-bit-of-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-746099</link>
		<dc:creator>ethyreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2548#comment-746099</guid>
		<description>speaking of standardizing cfml, has anyone else looked at the CFML wikipedia page...oowwch! that needs some work.

i guess the real question is what is the standard.  it seems everyone models adobe..or atleast has to implement most of their features, then each alternative has its own additional tags and functions.

can a brotha get a w3c spec for cfml?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of standardizing cfml, has anyone else looked at the CFML wikipedia page&#8230;oowwch! that needs some work.</p>
<p>i guess the real question is what is the standard.  it seems everyone models adobe..or atleast has to implement most of their features, then each alternative has its own additional tags and functions.</p>
<p>can a brotha get a w3c spec for cfml?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcsolas</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/06/14/the-week-in-coldfusion-4-10-june-more-details-on-railo-open-source-and-just-a-little-bit-of-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-744665</link>
		<dc:creator>mcsolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2548#comment-744665</guid>
		<description>Interesting.. going to keep an eye on some of these topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.. going to keep an eye on some of these topics.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
