<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @media 2008: Exploring The Alternative Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/30/media2008-day-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/30/media2008-day-one/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mattymcg</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/30/media2008-day-one/#comment-738585</link>
		<dc:creator>mattymcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2519#comment-738585</guid>
		<description>@Simon Mackie: I imagine that the math involved in placing those customizable containers in various locations is greatly simplified by using a fixed-width design. Just guessing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon Mackie: I imagine that the math involved in placing those customizable containers in various locations is greatly simplified by using a fixed-width design. Just guessing&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/30/media2008-day-one/#comment-737525</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2519#comment-737525</guid>
		<description>The comments from the BBC are interesting - for a while it seemed like they were going to stick at 800px wide for ever. It did look very narrow on my screen. I guess they have to cater for a diverse audience - did they mention why they didn't go with a fluid design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments from the BBC are interesting - for a while it seemed like they were going to stick at 800px wide for ever. It did look very narrow on my screen. I guess they have to cater for a diverse audience - did they mention why they didn&#8217;t go with a fluid design?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
