<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Conversation Is More Important Than The Topic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:42:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mattymcg</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-734915</link>
		<dc:creator>mattymcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2513#comment-734915</guid>
		<description>@malikyte: I think it&#039;s a given that any attempt to mimic Arrington&#039;s &quot;one word wonder&quot; on any blog would be nothing but an imitation. Changing the word would be akin to repeating a joke someone said and changing the name of the protagonist of the joke.

Something possibly worth thinking about, along the same lines, is what other avenues are there to &quot;mess with the medium&quot;? ravidor raises some good points above, that the success of something that challenges the idea of what constitutes a traditional post would depend on who and where it is published, but perhaps there is something to take away and apply to your own blog in this line of thought. I can&#039;t think of it, but maybe one of our readers can?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@malikyte: I think it&#8217;s a given that any attempt to mimic Arrington&#8217;s &#8220;one word wonder&#8221; on any blog would be nothing but an imitation. Changing the word would be akin to repeating a joke someone said and changing the name of the protagonist of the joke.</p>
<p>Something possibly worth thinking about, along the same lines, is what other avenues are there to &#8220;mess with the medium&#8221;? ravidor raises some good points above, that the success of something that challenges the idea of what constitutes a traditional post would depend on who and where it is published, but perhaps there is something to take away and apply to your own blog in this line of thought. I can&#8217;t think of it, but maybe one of our readers can?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busynic</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-734908</link>
		<dc:creator>busynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2513#comment-734908</guid>
		<description>Lets not confuse marketing with conversation - please.

Credibility is hard won and easy lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not confuse marketing with conversation &#8211; please.</p>
<p>Credibility is hard won and easy lost.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malikyte</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-734897</link>
		<dc:creator>malikyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2513#comment-734897</guid>
		<description>Okay, so then...let&#039;s get the communication started!  I believe there was a slight undertone in Matthew&#039;s post.

Besides..  What other one word topics do you think you could create that might bolster such a fanfare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so then&#8230;let&#8217;s get the communication started!  I believe there was a slight undertone in Matthew&#8217;s post.</p>
<p>Besides..  What other one word topics do you think you could create that might bolster such a fanfare?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam_uk7</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-734626</link>
		<dc:creator>liam_uk7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2513#comment-734626</guid>
		<description>Mikes post had a clever title on a Topic which he knew would spark a good discussion. So, although your theory is a good one, I think It&#039;s hard to believe.

Nobody is going to be there to discuss anything if your Topic or Title isn&#039;t any good, so yes, your discussion is more important once it gets going. But it won&#039;t get going without a good title, so its a catch 22 situation. Obviously there are some exceptions, but I&#039;m 100% sure that&#039;s how it happens, from what I myself have experienced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikes post had a clever title on a Topic which he knew would spark a good discussion. So, although your theory is a good one, I think It&#8217;s hard to believe.</p>
<p>Nobody is going to be there to discuss anything if your Topic or Title isn&#8217;t any good, so yes, your discussion is more important once it gets going. But it won&#8217;t get going without a good title, so its a catch 22 situation. Obviously there are some exceptions, but I&#8217;m 100% sure that&#8217;s how it happens, from what I myself have experienced.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravidor</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/28/the-conversation-is-more-important-than-the-topic/comment-page-1/#comment-734103</link>
		<dc:creator>ravidor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2513#comment-734103</guid>
		<description>I do not think so. The &lt;strong&gt;twitter&lt;/strong&gt; post is a proof that it is not the topic &lt;strong&gt;or&lt;/strong&gt; the conversation. It is the &lt;strong&gt;conversation&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; the &lt;strong&gt;topic&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;where&lt;/strong&gt; the topic/conversation taking place and who is the &lt;strong&gt;writer&lt;/strong&gt; and who are the &lt;strong&gt;commentators&lt;/strong&gt;. It is the &lt;strong&gt;mix&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think so. The <strong>twitter</strong> post is a proof that it is not the topic <strong>or</strong> the conversation. It is the <strong>conversation</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>topic</strong> and <strong>where</strong> the topic/conversation taking place and who is the <strong>writer</strong> and who are the <strong>commentators</strong>. It is the <strong>mix</strong>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
