<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Hidden Features New in Firefox 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-790684</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-790684</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for this article. I was tearing my hair out trying to make the inline work in FF. For me, sitehatchery&#039;s code 

&lt;code&gt;display:block;
float:left;&lt;/code&gt;

worked both in IE and FF so that&#039;s the one I used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for this article. I was tearing my hair out trying to make the inline work in FF. For me, sitehatchery&#8217;s code </p>
<code>display:block;
float:left;</code>
<p>worked both in IE and FF so that&#8217;s the one I used.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathieuf</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-736169</link>
		<dc:creator>mathieuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-736169</guid>
		<description>I am so glad to see soft hyphens. I used them a lot in the old days of TeX programming, and missed them in HTML. I hope the search tools know how to correctly deal with them, or will be made to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad to see soft hyphens. I used them a lot in the old days of TeX programming, and missed them in HTML. I hope the search tools know how to correctly deal with them, or will be made to.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas-e</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-734373</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas-e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-734373</guid>
		<description>Wow. I only just started webdesigning a couple of years ago - and I was APPALLED when I found out that soft hyphens were not an option in html. How could anyone ever think of NOT including that? Thanks for finally supporting the obviously necessary! :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I only just started webdesigning a couple of years ago &#8211; and I was APPALLED when I found out that soft hyphens were not an option in html. How could anyone ever think of NOT including that? Thanks for finally supporting the obviously necessary! :o)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-734372</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-734372</guid>
		<description>Wow. I only just started webdesigning a couple of years ago - and I was APPALLED when I found out that soft hyphens were not an option in html. How could anyone ever think of NOT including that? Thanks for finally supporting the obviously necessary! :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I only just started webdesigning a couple of years ago &#8211; and I was APPALLED when I found out that soft hyphens were not an option in html. How could anyone ever think of NOT including that? Thanks for finally supporting the obviously necessary! :o)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Yank</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-732844</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-732844</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, why does sitepoint.com feel the need to redefine decades’ worth of cursor behaviour, and force a normal arrow (instead of a ‘dog bone’) when hovering over text?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks for pointing out this bug! We’ve now fixed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, why does sitepoint.com feel the need to redefine decades’ worth of cursor behaviour, and force a normal arrow (instead of a ‘dog bone’) when hovering over text?</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks for pointing out this bug! We’ve now fixed it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Green</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-732838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-732838</guid>
		<description>Helpful and useful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpful and useful</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloodofeve</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-731827</link>
		<dc:creator>bloodofeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-731827</guid>
		<description>The &lt;code&gt;inline block&lt;/code&gt; is going to prove very useful for me as I build lots of compliant photograph albums for clients by hand and have found it really frustrating when the layout was affected by longer pieces of text. I can now manage the layout with out having to add larger height attributes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <code>inline block</code> is going to prove very useful for me as I build lots of compliant photograph albums for clients by hand and have found it really frustrating when the layout was affected by longer pieces of text. I can now manage the layout with out having to add larger height attributes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-731517</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-731517</guid>
		<description>So, why does sitepoint.com feel the need to redefine decades&#039; worth of cursor behaviour, and force a normal arrow (instead of a &#039;dog bone&#039;) when hovering over text? Do they think they know better than untold hours of GUI research, convention and user expectations? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, why does sitepoint.com feel the need to redefine decades&#8217; worth of cursor behaviour, and force a normal arrow (instead of a &#8216;dog bone&#8217;) when hovering over text? Do they think they know better than untold hours of GUI research, convention and user expectations? Just curious.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: percy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-731512</link>
		<dc:creator>percy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-731512</guid>
		<description>Isalberg,
I believe you can use WBR for that... nonstandard though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isalberg,<br />
I believe you can use WBR for that&#8230; nonstandard though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Fumo</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/05/23/two-hidden-features-new-in-firefox-3/comment-page-1/#comment-731463</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Fumo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=2501#comment-731463</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads-up! I&#039;ve had to wrangle often enough with floats to really appreciate the inline blocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads-up! I&#8217;ve had to wrangle often enough with floats to really appreciate the inline blocks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
