<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera and Safari Pass Acid3 Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:10:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-693956</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-693956</guid>
		<description>I agree with Safar that it passes the test. But for opera i doubt. Opera is out of our testing standards because of uncertain behaviour to normal scripts and layouts....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Safar that it passes the test. But for opera i doubt. Opera is out of our testing standards because of uncertain behaviour to normal scripts and layouts&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itpastorn</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-687260</link>
		<dc:creator>itpastorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-687260</guid>
		<description>@Hmm: Correct!

The arstechnica article is flawed (as well as many other articles from IT-magazines). It claims that Webkit and Opera actually passes the test. They do not - yet. Neither do they claim to.

They get the &quot;score&quot; and the rendering parts right, but they fail the &quot;smoothness&quot; criteria. Why won&#039;t people (=IT journalists) cite more authoritative sources - and cite them correctly? Read what Hixie says, read Opera&#039;s and Webkit&#039;s own announcements. IT mags are secondary sources - and quite often get things wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hmm: Correct!</p>
<p>The arstechnica article is flawed (as well as many other articles from IT-magazines). It claims that Webkit and Opera actually passes the test. They do not &#8211; yet. Neither do they claim to.</p>
<p>They get the &#8220;score&#8221; and the rendering parts right, but they fail the &#8220;smoothness&#8221; criteria. Why won&#8217;t people (=IT journalists) cite more authoritative sources &#8211; and cite them correctly? Read what Hixie says, read Opera&#8217;s and Webkit&#8217;s own announcements. IT mags are secondary sources &#8211; and quite often get things wrong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sauravgr8</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-678663</link>
		<dc:creator>sauravgr8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-678663</guid>
		<description>I Always thought that firefox is the best SEO friendly browser for its plugin features but now i know its something diff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Always thought that firefox is the best SEO friendly browser for its plugin features but now i know its something diff&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougoftheabaci</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-672198</link>
		<dc:creator>dougoftheabaci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-672198</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s a difference. I could be wrong however. All I know is that both Opera and WebKit have scored 100/100 on the Acid3 test. I think rending is only one specific part of the test but again I could be mistaken.

Arstechnica article:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/03/27/team-webkit-squeaks-past-team-opera-in-race-to-pass-acid-3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s a difference. I could be wrong however. All I know is that both Opera and WebKit have scored 100/100 on the Acid3 test. I think rending is only one specific part of the test but again I could be mistaken.</p>
<p>Arstechnica article:<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/03/27/team-webkit-squeaks-past-team-opera-in-race-to-pass-acid-3" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/03/27/team-webkit-squeaks-past-team-opera-in-race-to-pass-acid-3</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-672105</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-672105</guid>
		<description>They passed the rendering part of the Acid3 Browser Test, not the complete test right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They passed the rendering part of the Acid3 Browser Test, not the complete test right?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougoftheabaci</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-671304</link>
		<dc:creator>dougoftheabaci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-671304</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that last one was from me again. I&#039;m starting to wonder if there is a Safari issue and logging in when posting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that last one was from me again. I&#8217;m starting to wonder if there is a Safari issue and logging in when posting&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-671300</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-671300</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a joke, just grab the latest versions. This isn&#039;t even that new of news. It was posted on Engadget and Arstechnica a few days ago.

If memory serves the reason WebKit makes no. 1 (which it did with Acid2 as well) is because they found an error in the Acid3 test. Opera had hit 100/100 but after the Acid3 team fixed the error the guys at WebKit found they didn&#039;t make the cut and WebKit was ready to test and they got it. Also, the original success story was only an internal build, not public.

All that matters is that it&#039;s two of the bigger browsers that now have 100% standards compatibility with Firefox coming up fast. Now if only we could get IE to have anything but a highly pathetic showing we&#039;d be set. Maybe by the time IE8 goes public it&#039;ll actually get over 20/100 on Acid3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a joke, just grab the latest versions. This isn&#8217;t even that new of news. It was posted on Engadget and Arstechnica a few days ago.</p>
<p>If memory serves the reason WebKit makes no. 1 (which it did with Acid2 as well) is because they found an error in the Acid3 test. Opera had hit 100/100 but after the Acid3 team fixed the error the guys at WebKit found they didn&#8217;t make the cut and WebKit was ready to test and they got it. Also, the original success story was only an internal build, not public.</p>
<p>All that matters is that it&#8217;s two of the bigger browsers that now have 100% standards compatibility with Firefox coming up fast. Now if only we could get IE to have anything but a highly pathetic showing we&#8217;d be set. Maybe by the time IE8 goes public it&#8217;ll actually get over 20/100 on Acid3.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParkinT</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-671282</link>
		<dc:creator>ParkinT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-671282</guid>
		<description>The joke would be too obvious if the headline was, &quot;Internet Explorer passed Acid3&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The joke would be too obvious if the headline was, &#8220;Internet Explorer passed Acid3&#8243;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewCharron</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-670943</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewCharron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-670943</guid>
		<description>They did pass, this doesnt look like an april fools post to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did pass, this doesnt look like an april fools post to me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banago</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/comment-page-1/#comment-670940</link>
		<dc:creator>banago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/04/01/opera-and-safari-pass-acid3-test/#comment-670940</guid>
		<description>What is next ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is next &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
