<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft set to launch Semantic Web light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tish</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-699802</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-699802</guid>
		<description>I thought that here somebody will help me. 
From www.omfica.org I found the following "ICDL is a new standard for web site creators to describe web page structure and content for web crawlers. It gives an opportunity to web crawlers to obtain more precise information about web sites (URLs, pages, HTML structure, and thematic content). ICDL is compatible with existing Semantic Web concepts defined by W3C (RDF and OWL). "
Is that project really compatible with existing ones, or I just waste my time on registering there and becoming a member?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that here somebody will help me.<br />
From <a href="http://www.omfica.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.omfica.org</a> I found the following &#8220;ICDL is a new standard for web site creators to describe web page structure and content for web crawlers. It gives an opportunity to web crawlers to obtain more precise information about web sites (URLs, pages, HTML structure, and thematic content). ICDL is compatible with existing Semantic Web concepts defined by W3C (RDF and OWL). &#8220;<br />
Is that project really compatible with existing ones, or I just waste my time on registering there and becoming a member?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-668396</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-668396</guid>
		<description>the video doesn't have audio?!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the video doesn&#8217;t have audio?!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malikyte</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-660608</link>
		<dc:creator>malikyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-660608</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else notice that in the video "collapse node" was selected yet it seemed like it expanded?  :)  Either way, it's interesting to see how Microsoft has yet again created a variation on a proposed standard (RDFa) - but at least they are pushing for interoperability...hopefully it's not just one-way interoperability (their system will work with both, others will only work with RDFa).  I'd love to see more news releases on this as they come.  Thanks, David, for bringing all of this amazingly cool stuff to our attentions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else notice that in the video &#8220;collapse node&#8221; was selected yet it seemed like it expanded?  :)  Either way, it&#8217;s interesting to see how Microsoft has yet again created a variation on a proposed standard (RDFa) - but at least they are pushing for interoperability&#8230;hopefully it&#8217;s not just one-way interoperability (their system will work with both, others will only work with RDFa).  I&#8217;d love to see more news releases on this as they come.  Thanks, David, for bringing all of this amazingly cool stuff to our attentions!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XLCowBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-660582</link>
		<dc:creator>XLCowBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/26/microsoft-set-to-launch-semantic-web-light/#comment-660582</guid>
		<description>A bit early for April fools? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit early for April fools? ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
