<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint &#187; SVG Is The Future Of Application Development</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-852398</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint &#187; SVG Is The Future Of Application Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-852398</guid>
		<description>[...] A marriage of &#8220;lickable&#8221; graphics with semantic content is precisely what we&#8217;ve been after for years now. Interfaces built with the combination of HTML and CSS just aren&#8217;t capable of providing fancy GUIs, but as this was never what that technology was designed for, that limitation shouldn&#8217;t be a surprise. On the other hand, every application has some data associated with it and if Web &#8220;mash-ups&#8221; have taught us one thing, it&#8217;s that one application&#8217;s data is far more useful when combined with another application&#8217;s data. Lucky for us, describing data and its relationship with other data is a natural fit for standard Web technologies like XHTML and RDFa. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A marriage of &ldquo;lickable&rdquo; graphics with semantic content is precisely what we&#8217;ve been after for years now. Interfaces built with the combination of HTML and CSS just aren&#8217;t capable of providing fancy GUIs, but as this was never what that technology was designed for, that limitation shouldn&#8217;t be a surprise. On the other hand, every application has some data associated with it and if Web &#8220;mash-ups&#8221; have taught us one thing, it&#8217;s that one application&#8217;s data is far more useful when combined with another application&#8217;s data. Lucky for us, describing data and its relationship with other data is a natural fit for standard Web technologies like XHTML and RDFa. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDFa, Web Development Standards, &#38; SEO - KoMarketing Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-847674</link>
		<dc:creator>RDFa, Web Development Standards, &#38; SEO - KoMarketing Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-847674</guid>
		<description>[...] Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fahdi&#8217;s Personal Blog &#187; Thanks Rasmus Lerdorf, you made my day</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-794350</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahdi&#8217;s Personal Blog &#187; Thanks Rasmus Lerdorf, you made my day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-794350</guid>
		<description>[...] rich search you also get enhanced search results. I have blogged about this previously so take a look. It is really cool stuff and I will be discussing it in much more detail over the course of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rich search you also get enhanced search results. I have blogged about this previously so take a look. It is really cool stuff and I will be discussing it in much more detail over the course of the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; Rasmus Lerdorf - PHP frameworks? Think again.</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-788029</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; Rasmus Lerdorf - PHP frameworks? Think again.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-788029</guid>
		<description>[...] rich search you also get enhanced search results. I have blogged about this previously so take a look. It is really cool stuff and I will be discussing it in much more detail over the course of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rich search you also get enhanced search results. I have blogged about this previously so take a look. It is really cool stuff and I will be discussing it in much more detail over the course of the [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppzDrive.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; RDFa and Yahoo SearchMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-717024</link>
		<dc:creator>AppzDrive.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; RDFa and Yahoo SearchMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-717024</guid>
		<description>[...] Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines &#8212; David Peterson, sitepoint Blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines &#8212; David Peterson, sitepoint Blog. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nodalities &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week&#8217;s Semantic Web</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-695845</link>
		<dc:creator>Nodalities &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week&#8217;s Semantic Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-695845</guid>
		<description>[...] Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why RDFa is the only Web scaleable metadata format for next-generation search engines [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More semantics in Yahoo searches courtesy of Microformats :: Coding and Dreaming</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-669746</link>
		<dc:creator>More semantics in Yahoo searches courtesy of Microformats :: Coding and Dreaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-669746</guid>
		<description>[...] really have time at the moment to get into a full-on Microformats chit-chat, I did however find this article on SitePoint authored by David Peterson that goes into some depth as to why it might be better to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really have time at the moment to get into a full-on Microformats chit-chat, I did however find this article on SitePoint authored by David Peterson that goes into some depth as to why it might be better to [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Brinker</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-659789</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Brinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-659789</guid>
		<description>Excellent points on RDFa vs. microformats. I find the arguments on scalability and mixability particularly compelling, as it clearly provides much more flexibility to site owners to tailor their semantic web presence.

Thanks for the comment on my blog -- folks who read my post on marketing implications [1] of this move by Yahoo! will find it very interesting.

[1] http://www.chiefmartec.com/2008/03/seo-semantic-we.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points on RDFa vs. microformats. I find the arguments on scalability and mixability particularly compelling, as it clearly provides much more flexibility to site owners to tailor their semantic web presence.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment on my blog &#8212; folks who read my post on marketing implications [1] of this move by Yahoo! will find it very interesting.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.chiefmartec.com/2008/03/seo-semantic-we.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chiefmartec.com/2008/03/seo-semantic-we.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david.seth.p</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-658948</link>
		<dc:creator>david.seth.p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-658948</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Philip - I can think of one other problem.. no one’s worried about it right now, but what happens when metaspam comes?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are a lot of people thinking about this; here is someone inside Yahoo itself [1].

[1] http://dubinko.info/blog/2008/03/13/the-lowercase-semantic-web-goes-mainstream/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Philip &#8211; I can think of one other problem.. no one’s worried about it right now, but what happens when metaspam comes?</p></blockquote>
<p>There are a lot of people thinking about this; here is someone inside Yahoo itself [1].</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://dubinko.info/blog/2008/03/13/the-lowercase-semantic-web-goes-mainstream/" rel="nofollow">http://dubinko.info/blog/2008/03/13/the-lowercase-semantic-web-goes-mainstream/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david.seth.p</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-658482</link>
		<dc:creator>david.seth.p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/16/why-rdfa-is-the-only-web-scaleable-metadata-format-for-next-generation-search-engines/#comment-658482</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Daniel O&#039;Connor - Boo hoo! When it’s as easy as it is with GRDDL, I’m really, really not fussed.

Imagine: I make a new microformat, and I take the time to make a profileTransformation - this problem is lessened dramatically.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is not &lt;em&gt;*just me*&lt;/em&gt; saying this. Yahoo will only support 5 microformats, Firefox 3 [1] will also only support 5 microformats.

The fundamental problem with microformats is that there is no standard model so no standard way to extract them from pages. There is no way around it. And when &lt;strong&gt;big&lt;/strong&gt; players with a lot of resources put their support only behind a small subset it really makes it clear that microformats don&#039;t work on the scale of the global linked Web.

[1] http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Using_microformats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Daniel O&#8217;Connor &#8211; Boo hoo! When it’s as easy as it is with GRDDL, I’m really, really not fussed.</p>
<p>Imagine: I make a new microformat, and I take the time to make a profileTransformation &#8211; this problem is lessened dramatically.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is not <em>*just me*</em> saying this. Yahoo will only support 5 microformats, Firefox 3 [1] will also only support 5 microformats.</p>
<p>The fundamental problem with microformats is that there is no standard model so no standard way to extract them from pages. There is no way around it. And when <strong>big</strong> players with a lot of resources put their support only behind a small subset it really makes it clear that microformats don&#8217;t work on the scale of the global linked Web.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Using_microformats" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Using_microformats</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
