<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft &#038; IE8: Let&#8217;s Move On and Make It Great</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gilzow</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-653947</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilzow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-653947</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;like most developers I know I develop html and css using IE then hack/workaround for firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
@neildonald - Funny, I dont know a single web developer that develops in IE first and then in the other browser.  Everyone I know writes their standards-compliant code and tests in FF first.  Then has to go back and break their code (or litter it with conditional IE comments) to get the IE family to get the code to display correctly.  I've also been coding since the v4 and 5 days, and dont ever remember having to hack a browser &lt;em&gt;except&lt;/em&gt; IE to get my pages to display correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>like most developers I know I develop html and css using IE then hack/workaround for firefox.</p></blockquote>
<p>@neildonald - Funny, I dont know a single web developer that develops in IE first and then in the other browser.  Everyone I know writes their standards-compliant code and tests in FF first.  Then has to go back and break their code (or litter it with conditional IE comments) to get the IE family to get the code to display correctly.  I&#8217;ve also been coding since the v4 and 5 days, and dont ever remember having to hack a browser <em>except</em> IE to get my pages to display correctly.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwb_99</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-653681</link>
		<dc:creator>wwb_99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-653681</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan: you have a good point about OOXML. But that can be read a few ways, one of which is that the whole debacle made Microsoft realize that you can either have open standards or not have open standards. Trying to play the middle and be kinda sorta open just don't cut the mustard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan: you have a good point about OOXML. But that can be read a few ways, one of which is that the whole debacle made Microsoft realize that you can either have open standards or not have open standards. Trying to play the middle and be kinda sorta open just don&#8217;t cut the mustard.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyssen</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-653563</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-653563</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;like most developers I know I develop html and css using IE then hack/workaround for firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You keep some odd company then because that's completely backwards. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>like most developers I know I develop html and css using IE then hack/workaround for firefox.</p></blockquote>
<p>You keep some odd company then because that&#8217;s completely backwards. :/</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-652435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-652435</guid>
		<description>@ neildonald: Most developers I know develop in Firefox first (using superb plugins like the Web Developer toolbar and Firebug). If it works in FF it will probably work in Safari and Opera too. Finally we do fixes for IE. BTW, there's a reason microsoft=bad; the_rest=good; I've spent hours debugging CSS that other browsers handled that IE choked on. And the debugging in IE is atrocious.

@Wyatt. Nice try but Microsoft's shenanigans with OOXML make be doubtful that the leopards has changed its spots. I won't give MS the benefit of the doubt. If they want to play nice with open standards then good on them; but I'll wait to see their whether their actions match their words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ neildonald: Most developers I know develop in Firefox first (using superb plugins like the Web Developer toolbar and Firebug). If it works in FF it will probably work in Safari and Opera too. Finally we do fixes for IE. BTW, there&#8217;s a reason microsoft=bad; the_rest=good; I&#8217;ve spent hours debugging CSS that other browsers handled that IE choked on. And the debugging in IE is atrocious.</p>
<p>@Wyatt. Nice try but Microsoft&#8217;s shenanigans with OOXML make be doubtful that the leopards has changed its spots. I won&#8217;t give MS the benefit of the doubt. If they want to play nice with open standards then good on them; but I&#8217;ll wait to see their whether their actions match their words.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwb_99</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-652249</link>
		<dc:creator>wwb_99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-652249</guid>
		<description>@Jubarr (and his followers): why does Microsoft care about that? They give away IE for free, so people using Firefox does not hurt the bottom line at all.

@neildonald: Very good point. I started my web coding in the waning days of the version 4 and 5 browsers, and I remember the pain. If you stayed off the bleeding edge and did not push the CSS-P envelope too hard, you could get by OK with an occasional bit of presentational markup without hacking pages at all. I've honestly never served a page with a browser-specific hack or conditional stylesheet in my life. Otoh, I've been coding boring Line of Business stuff more than exciting, pretty public web apps in recent memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jubarr (and his followers): why does Microsoft care about that? They give away IE for free, so people using Firefox does not hurt the bottom line at all.</p>
<p>@neildonald: Very good point. I started my web coding in the waning days of the version 4 and 5 browsers, and I remember the pain. If you stayed off the bleeding edge and did not push the CSS-P envelope too hard, you could get by OK with an occasional bit of presentational markup without hacking pages at all. I&#8217;ve honestly never served a page with a browser-specific hack or conditional stylesheet in my life. Otoh, I&#8217;ve been coding boring Line of Business stuff more than exciting, pretty public web apps in recent memory.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neildonald</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-652087</link>
		<dc:creator>neildonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-652087</guid>
		<description>i'm a little fed up with the microsoft=bad; the_rest=good approach.  Internet Explorer 7's rendering of markup is the defacto standard which all web based applications must meet to been seen to work by a) coders b) users and most importantly c) who's paying for the development. OK so Microsoft isn't the most innovative browser developer but it shouldn't get slated forever for the marquee tag!  (remember netscape 4's BLINK?) Having hand coded HTML for 8 or 9 years, i can honestly say it's now easier than ever to write  markup which is viewable with IE, FF, Opera, safari, konqueror etc, as well as being search engine friendly and viewable on mobile phones. like most developers I know I develop html and css using IE then hack/workaround for firefox.  Sticking in the odd empty "clear: both" DIV to preserve formatting between browsers is hardly troublesome compared to the complete rewrites required for the gen 4 &#38; 5 browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m a little fed up with the microsoft=bad; the_rest=good approach.  Internet Explorer 7&#8217;s rendering of markup is the defacto standard which all web based applications must meet to been seen to work by a) coders b) users and most importantly c) who&#8217;s paying for the development. OK so Microsoft isn&#8217;t the most innovative browser developer but it shouldn&#8217;t get slated forever for the marquee tag!  (remember netscape 4&#8217;s BLINK?) Having hand coded HTML for 8 or 9 years, i can honestly say it&#8217;s now easier than ever to write  markup which is viewable with IE, FF, Opera, safari, konqueror etc, as well as being search engine friendly and viewable on mobile phones. like most developers I know I develop html and css using IE then hack/workaround for firefox.  Sticking in the odd empty &#8220;clear: both&#8221; DIV to preserve formatting between browsers is hardly troublesome compared to the complete rewrites required for the gen 4 &amp; 5 browsers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf_22</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651794</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf_22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651794</guid>
		<description>Me too... ^ ^ ^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too&#8230; ^ ^ ^</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris ward</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651562</link>
		<dc:creator>chris ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651562</guid>
		<description>totally agree with jubarr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally agree with jubarr</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jubarr</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jubarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651405</guid>
		<description>They are doing this because they want us web developers/designers to stop telling all our family, friends, girlfriend and clients to switch to firefox...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are doing this because they want us web developers/designers to stop telling all our family, friends, girlfriend and clients to switch to firefox&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwb_99</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651227</link>
		<dc:creator>wwb_99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/03/10/microsoft-ie8-lets-move-on-and-make-it-great/#comment-651227</guid>
		<description>@m0n5t3r: that is actually an awesome idea. If I can find an appropriate party, I'll definitely pass that along. Not sure how well it will fly, but it does make boatloads of sense.

@Chuck: I can't argue that you are not historically correct. But past performance is not necessarily a predictor of future performance.  There are a lot of signs of change in the air--I don't think MS thinks it could even approach the dominance of the early '00s and definitely got the lesson about what not to do from that period.

@Wolf_22: No worries man. We cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@m0n5t3r: that is actually an awesome idea. If I can find an appropriate party, I&#8217;ll definitely pass that along. Not sure how well it will fly, but it does make boatloads of sense.</p>
<p>@Chuck: I can&#8217;t argue that you are not historically correct. But past performance is not necessarily a predictor of future performance.  There are a lot of signs of change in the air&#8211;I don&#8217;t think MS thinks it could even approach the dominance of the early &#8217;00s and definitely got the lesson about what not to do from that period.</p>
<p>@Wolf_22: No worries man. We cool.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
