<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion Technical Journals, Past and Present</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/#comment-558277</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/#comment-558277</guid>
		<description>The edition on OOP in ColdFusion was worth the entry price of $50.00 in and of itself. This is a very valuable resource and will be resubscribing again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The edition on OOP in ColdFusion was worth the entry price of $50.00 in and of itself. This is a very valuable resource and will be resubscribing again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/#comment-541678</link>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/#comment-541678</guid>
		<description>FWIW, CFDJ was over $80 a year, had less content, and was almost as sporadic. I was a subscriber from the beginning and on a regular basis issues would be missing, very late or non existant. Moreover, in the last 2 years of publication, there was very little that was useful to me.

In contract given the quality of the content of the Fusion Authority Quarterly, its been well worth the $50. All my copies are heavily annotated, highlighted and dog eared. I cannot say the same for any edition of CFDJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, CFDJ was over $80 a year, had less content, and was almost as sporadic. I was a subscriber from the beginning and on a regular basis issues would be missing, very late or non existant. Moreover, in the last 2 years of publication, there was very little that was useful to me.</p>
<p>In contract given the quality of the content of the Fusion Authority Quarterly, its been well worth the $50. All my copies are heavily annotated, highlighted and dog eared. I cannot say the same for any edition of CFDJ.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/#comment-534572</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/04/coldfusion-technical-journals-past-and-present/#comment-534572</guid>
		<description>Yes, FAQU has excellent technical content. But before you plunk down $50 for a yearly subscription, be warned that this "quarterly" magazine is only published sporadically, and so far only four issues in the past two years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, FAQU has excellent technical content. But before you plunk down $50 for a yearly subscription, be warned that this &#8220;quarterly&#8221; magazine is only published sporadically, and so far only four issues in the past two years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
