Comments on: Preparing for Rails 2.0 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/ Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:26:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: AkitaOnRails http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-548096 AkitaOnRails Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:48:56 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-548096 I invite everybody to take a look at a screencast I've compiled yesterday. This is the classic Blog app built using Rails 2.0. I think it is the First Rails 2.0 full featured screencast around. See it "here":http://www.akitaonrails.com/2007/12/10/the-first-rails-2-0-screencast-english I invite everybody to take a look at a screencast I’ve compiled yesterday. This is the classic Blog app built using Rails 2.0. I think it is the First Rails 2.0 full featured screencast around.

See it “here”:http://www.akitaonrails.com/2007/12/10/the-first-rails-2-0-screencast-english

]]> By: MarcelloDL http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-545476 MarcelloDL Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:56:10 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-545476 render :partial seems not assuming the calling controller anymore, so: render :partial => '/partial' won't work. render :partial => 'controller_name/partial' will instead pick the partial named "_partial" in app/views/controller_name render :partial seems not assuming the calling controller anymore, so:

render :partial => ‘/partial’

won’t work.

render :partial => ‘controller_name/partial’

will instead pick the partial named “_partial” in app/views/controller_name

]]> By: yougottabekidding http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-439463 yougottabekidding Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:21:54 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-439463 A <em>slow</em> start!? Rails is going like gangbusters, and has for a couple of years. ParkinT has it completely backwards. It is not Rails that has benefited from SitePoint, but SitePoint that has benefited from Rails, capitalizing on its popularity by publishing books. Rails would be just fine (thank you) without SitePoint. Not to say the Sitepoint books aren't good, but they cannot in a million years take credit for Rails' success. A slow start!? Rails is going like gangbusters, and has for a couple of years.

ParkinT has it completely backwards. It is not Rails that has benefited from SitePoint, but SitePoint that has benefited from Rails, capitalizing on its popularity by publishing books. Rails would be just fine (thank you) without SitePoint. Not to say the Sitepoint books aren’t good, but they cannot in a million years take credit for Rails’ success.

]]> By: ParkinT http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-431349 ParkinT Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:21:43 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-431349 Wow. After a slow start, Rails seems to be 'gathering steam'! I think this is, in large part, due to the recent publications Sitepoint has provided; permitting more developers to get their hands dirty with Ruby on Rails. I am having fun learning a new language (adding to my current collection of over a dozen) and applying the many lessons offered here. Wow. After a slow start, Rails seems to be ‘gathering steam’!
I think this is, in large part, due to the recent publications Sitepoint has provided; permitting more developers to get their hands dirty with Ruby on Rails.
I am having fun learning a new language (adding to my current collection of over a dozen) and applying the many lessons offered here.

]]> By: kommen http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-431208 kommen Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:15:48 +0000 http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/10/31/preparing-for-rails-20/#comment-431208 There is a little script which checks existing rails for a rough rails 2.0 compatibility: http://pastie.caboo.se/private/krcevozww61drdeza13e3a There is a little script which checks existing rails for a rough rails 2.0 compatibility:
http://pastie.caboo.se/private/krcevozww61drdeza13e3a

]]>