<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Wire: Google&#8217;s New Meta Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/07/24/news-wire-googles-new-meta-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/07/24/news-wire-googles-new-meta-tag/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:18:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cranial-bore</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/07/24/news-wire-googles-new-meta-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-315033</link>
		<dc:creator>cranial-bore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/07/24/news-wire-googles-new-meta-tag/#comment-315033</guid>
		<description>So does the use of the unavailable_after tag mean that the document will actually be REMOVED from Google&#039;s index once expired, or it simply won&#039;t be crawled again for updates?

The name of the tag would have me believe the former, but the wording of the article implies that it only relates to crawling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does the use of the unavailable_after tag mean that the document will actually be REMOVED from Google&#8217;s index once expired, or it simply won&#8217;t be crawled again for updates?</p>
<p>The name of the tag would have me believe the former, but the wording of the article implies that it only relates to crawling.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
