<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Users 3 Times Less Likely to Click Ads Than Google Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mavrck</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-652756</link>
		<dc:creator>mavrck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-652756</guid>
		<description>I just got tired of punching the monkey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got tired of punching the monkey.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razor512</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-512855</link>
		<dc:creator>Razor512</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-512855</guid>
		<description>the reason why we use adblock is because many sites have annoying ads that are poorly made and waste our bandwidth

If you use a program like netlimiter, you will see that if you load a ad filled web page, with adblock disabled, the page will usually be around 1-3MB in size   but with adblock enabled,   (if you clear the cache and reload the page, it only takes about 100-300KB) almost 80-90% of th page file size is ads, this is annoying for the broadband users and  painful for the dialup users 

most ads are  hosted by the 3rd party ad server so it has no effect on the site owner so the site owner doesnt care about the file size of the ads, but for the end user who actually goes on the web page, it is wasting their bandwidth  and if the user has a monthly bandwidth cap them  it is really hard on them

also what kind of idiot do you think we are to actually believe that we will get a free a $5000 computer is we can click the button 5 times in a row?

also, many of us spend all day on our computers, (I personally spend  a lot of time  coding and doing graphic design) do you think were really interested in boosting our lovelife because we are no longer able to get hard?


if you have a site and your not getting the ad revenue you want then at least look at the ads on your page and  ask your self, who in their right mind would actually want this,  not many people are quick to buy random pills from a company located in the basement of a rundown hut in Zimbabwe or  any other random place

no one wants free screensavers from a place named doubleclick or adserv or gator  

if you want people to not block your ads then  put ads that are actually useful 

if you look at real tech sites, you will see that the ads are usually not blocked by adblock  (i run my own adblock filter http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2241e/tips/id1.html and i don't even block them), on sites like tomshardware,  they have ads, about half of them are blocked and the other half is left alone  as there useful, when they review new computer hardware, the ads are clean and direct to the point,   they  list the top sites (amazon, newegg etc) and list their prices for the product)   while their other ads advertising random crap like coffee, they get blocked because what does coffee have to do with ddr3 memory support in  new motherboards?

from a annoying ad filled site owners point of view, adblock blocks all their ads and they cant get av revenue from them anymore  

when in reality, adblock only blocks the stupid ads 

it is like the spam filter  in everyones e-mail account, real e-mails go through and junk and other crap like that

spam is illegal   if it was up to me, annoying ads in webpages would also be illegal,  ad filled webpages will generally crash the web browser  on many mobile devices  thats like  attacking mobile device users


to everyone who has  ads on their website,  go and look at the ads on your page, and check if they have anything to do with the content of your page.  (in other words, if your writing a review on new heatsinks, don't show me a ad for heartburn medicine, show a ad  for the lowest price for the heatsink  out of all the  trusted big sites like amazon and newegg)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the reason why we use adblock is because many sites have annoying ads that are poorly made and waste our bandwidth</p>
<p>If you use a program like netlimiter, you will see that if you load a ad filled web page, with adblock disabled, the page will usually be around 1-3MB in size   but with adblock enabled,   (if you clear the cache and reload the page, it only takes about 100-300KB) almost 80-90% of th page file size is ads, this is annoying for the broadband users and  painful for the dialup users </p>
<p>most ads are  hosted by the 3rd party ad server so it has no effect on the site owner so the site owner doesnt care about the file size of the ads, but for the end user who actually goes on the web page, it is wasting their bandwidth  and if the user has a monthly bandwidth cap them  it is really hard on them</p>
<p>also what kind of idiot do you think we are to actually believe that we will get a free a $5000 computer is we can click the button 5 times in a row?</p>
<p>also, many of us spend all day on our computers, (I personally spend  a lot of time  coding and doing graphic design) do you think were really interested in boosting our lovelife because we are no longer able to get hard?</p>
<p>if you have a site and your not getting the ad revenue you want then at least look at the ads on your page and  ask your self, who in their right mind would actually want this,  not many people are quick to buy random pills from a company located in the basement of a rundown hut in Zimbabwe or  any other random place</p>
<p>no one wants free screensavers from a place named doubleclick or adserv or gator  </p>
<p>if you want people to not block your ads then  put ads that are actually useful </p>
<p>if you look at real tech sites, you will see that the ads are usually not blocked by adblock  (i run my own adblock filter <a href="http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2241e/tips/id1.html" rel="nofollow">http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2241e/tips/id1.html</a> and i don&#8217;t even block them), on sites like tomshardware,  they have ads, about half of them are blocked and the other half is left alone  as there useful, when they review new computer hardware, the ads are clean and direct to the point,   they  list the top sites (amazon, newegg etc) and list their prices for the product)   while their other ads advertising random crap like coffee, they get blocked because what does coffee have to do with ddr3 memory support in  new motherboards?</p>
<p>from a annoying ad filled site owners point of view, adblock blocks all their ads and they cant get av revenue from them anymore  </p>
<p>when in reality, adblock only blocks the stupid ads </p>
<p>it is like the spam filter  in everyones e-mail account, real e-mails go through and junk and other crap like that</p>
<p>spam is illegal   if it was up to me, annoying ads in webpages would also be illegal,  ad filled webpages will generally crash the web browser  on many mobile devices  thats like  attacking mobile device users</p>
<p>to everyone who has  ads on their website,  go and look at the ads on your page, and check if they have anything to do with the content of your page.  (in other words, if your writing a review on new heatsinks, don&#8217;t show me a ad for heartburn medicine, show a ad  for the lowest price for the heatsink  out of all the  trusted big sites like amazon and newegg)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becca</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-510253</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-510253</guid>
		<description>There is always the smallest, slightest chance that the people who frequent Digg.com and other such sites have the common sense not surf news/info sites when they're looking to buy something.  Cause, ya know, if you do want to buy something it's usually much quicker to do a Google product search.

And personally, if the ads on a web page are excessive, annoying, or disruptive, I usually don't go back to the site.  Ever.  Truly, if you want to piss me off put one of those damned in-page pop up ads directly in front of what I'm trying to read and don't give me any other way to close it except clicking on the ad.  Nope, not playing that game either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is always the smallest, slightest chance that the people who frequent Digg.com and other such sites have the common sense not surf news/info sites when they&#8217;re looking to buy something.  Cause, ya know, if you do want to buy something it&#8217;s usually much quicker to do a Google product search.</p>
<p>And personally, if the ads on a web page are excessive, annoying, or disruptive, I usually don&#8217;t go back to the site.  Ever.  Truly, if you want to piss me off put one of those damned in-page pop up ads directly in front of what I&#8217;m trying to read and don&#8217;t give me any other way to close it except clicking on the ad.  Nope, not playing that game either.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg user</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-509681</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-509681</guid>
		<description>When I am walking down the street or have the television on, I do not instantly go out and buy whatever I see. Why do you expect me to on your website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I am walking down the street or have the television on, I do not instantly go out and buy whatever I see. Why do you expect me to on your website?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOLz</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-509263</link>
		<dc:creator>LOLz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-509263</guid>
		<description>Spam that rejects users... lol   how ironic :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam that rejects users&#8230; lol   how ironic :P</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon.</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508963</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508963</guid>
		<description>OH NOES, SOMEONE DOESN'T CLICK ON OUR SHITTY ADS, WHATEVER SHALL WE DO?

Shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH NOES, SOMEONE DOESN&#8217;T CLICK ON OUR SHITTY ADS, WHATEVER SHALL WE DO?</p>
<p>Shut the fuck up.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaC</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508771</link>
		<dc:creator>MaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508771</guid>
		<description>@MarketingGod

Adverts are rarely hosted on their publisher's resources, so in reality they don't contribute to the bandwidth usage - they are simply there to recoup the costs of the resources used to view standard pages.

Generally speaking, I bet Digg (and other tech site) users have a high percentage of adblock usage, and as a result, the stats may not reflect the true number of non-clicks since the Chitika ads will not even have been requested for certain visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MarketingGod</p>
<p>Adverts are rarely hosted on their publisher&#8217;s resources, so in reality they don&#8217;t contribute to the bandwidth usage - they are simply there to recoup the costs of the resources used to view standard pages.</p>
<p>Generally speaking, I bet Digg (and other tech site) users have a high percentage of adblock usage, and as a result, the stats may not reflect the true number of non-clicks since the Chitika ads will not even have been requested for certain visitors.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508432</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508432</guid>
		<description>Honestly, who gives a flying fuck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, who gives a flying fuck?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508142</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508142</guid>
		<description>How about this: Don't start a blog or website with the sole purpose of making money by placing ads! If you do, you're a douchebag. Try getting a career that doesn't annoy people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this: Don&#8217;t start a blog or website with the sole purpose of making money by placing ads! If you do, you&#8217;re a douchebag. Try getting a career that doesn&#8217;t annoy people.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508021</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 07:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/04/10/digg-users-3-times-less-likely-to-click-ads-than-google-users/#comment-508021</guid>
		<description>I bet sitepoint users don't click on ads either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet sitepoint users don&#8217;t click on ads either&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
