<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Video: Recognizing Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Day Web 2.0 Died &#124; Dungiis's Official Website</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-853055</link>
		<dc:creator>The Day Web 2.0 Died &#124; Dungiis's Official Website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-853055</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 has been something like a fun parlor game for a few years now. There’s a long history of people trying to come up with a unified definition of Web 2.0. But like the elusive theory of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 has been something like a fun parlor game for a few years now. There’s a long history of people trying to come up with a unified definition of Web 2.0. But like the elusive theory of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Day Web 2.0 Died &#124; whyitwas.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-850317</link>
		<dc:creator>The Day Web 2.0 Died &#124; whyitwas.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-850317</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 has been something like a fun parlor game for a few years now. There’s a long history of people trying to come up with a unified definition of Web 2.0. But like the elusive theory of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 has been something like a fun parlor game for a few years now. There’s a long history of people trying to come up with a unified definition of Web 2.0. But like the elusive theory of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint &#187; The Day Web 2.0 Died</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-849723</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint &#187; The Day Web 2.0 Died</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-849723</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 has been something like a fun parlor game for a few years now. There&#8217;s a long history of people trying to come up with a unified definition of Web 2.0. But like the elusive theory of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 has been something like a fun parlor game for a few years now. There&#8217;s a long history of people trying to come up with a unified definition of Web 2.0. But like the elusive theory of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rothko</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-546009</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rothko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-546009</guid>
		<description>As always a pleasure to read and listen to your articles, Kevin.  Really an eye-opener because I heard lots of nonsense about Web 2.0, which is understandable as the name is pretty abstract.  In any case, I can live with this explanation of web 2.0 and you might have made history, my boy :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always a pleasure to read and listen to your articles, Kevin.  Really an eye-opener because I heard lots of nonsense about Web 2.0, which is understandable as the name is pretty abstract.  In any case, I can live with this explanation of web 2.0 and you might have made history, my boy :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; Are You Ready For Web 3.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-216614</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; Are You Ready For Web 3.0?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-216614</guid>
		<description>[...] Granted, we&#8217;ve struggled until now to even agree on what the term &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; means (although SitePoint&#8217;s own Kevin Yank has done a pretty admirable job of explaining the term in the past). As a result of the overuse of this marketing-friendly term, now anyone who doesn&#8217;t work in marketing physically cringes whenever they see or hear the term. Which is a shame, in my opinion&#8212;something that could potentially be used in a positive manner to communicate a new phase of the Web is instead being used to poke fun at the tech boom (yours truly, guilty as charged) and mock those who generate more spin than substance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Granted, we&#8217;ve struggled until now to even agree on what the term &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; means (although SitePoint&#8217;s own Kevin Yank has done a pretty admirable job of explaining the term in the past). As a result of the overuse of this marketing-friendly term, now anyone who doesn&#8217;t work in marketing physically cringes whenever they see or hear the term. Which is a shame, in my opinion&#8212;something that could potentially be used in a positive manner to communicate a new phase of the Web is instead being used to poke fun at the tech boom (yours truly, guilty as charged) and mock those who generate more spin than substance. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Librarians Matter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Here&#8217;s some super slides.</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-172477</link>
		<dc:creator>Librarians Matter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Here&#8217;s some super slides.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-172477</guid>
		<description>[...] Another set of slides which caught my eye this week are Kevin Yank&#8217;s slides from a talk he did for VALA libraryfolk in Melbourne in November 2006 about Recognising Web 2.0. He&#8217;s made a screencast using the live audio (including audience responses) from his talk as the soundtrack to the relevant slides. There is a captioned version, which somehow made his points clearer still. It would have been nice if the questions from the floor were audible as well as the answers - but it&#8217;s a small quibble. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another set of slides which caught my eye this week are Kevin Yank&#8217;s slides from a talk he did for VALA libraryfolk in Melbourne in November 2006 about Recognising Web 2.0. He&#8217;s made a screencast using the live audio (including audience responses) from his talk as the soundtrack to the relevant slides. There is a captioned version, which somehow made his points clearer still. It would have been nice if the questions from the floor were audible as well as the answers &#8211; but it&#8217;s a small quibble. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senia.com &#8212; Positive Psychology Blog &#187; Web 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-169915</link>
		<dc:creator>Senia.com &#8212; Positive Psychology Blog &#187; Web 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-169915</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a great ideo about Web 2.0 by Kevin Yang at sitepoint. It&#8217;s a one-hour presentation and you can view the captioned version (if you don&#8217;t want audio) or the uncaptioned. Here it is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a great ideo about Web 2.0 by Kevin Yang at sitepoint. It&#8217;s a one-hour presentation and you can view the captioned version (if you don&#8217;t want audio) or the uncaptioned. Here it is. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibCasting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PowerPoint Screencasts</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-168386</link>
		<dc:creator>LibCasting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PowerPoint Screencasts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-168386</guid>
		<description>[...] Kevin Yank has posted Recognizing Web 2.0 which is a screen cast from his talk of that title delivered to the Victorian Association for Library Automation. He has a captioned and uncaptioned version of the screencast linked. These are screencasts of his lecture, which means they both are very large files. Even on broadband, give either one some time to download. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kevin Yank has posted Recognizing Web 2.0 which is a screen cast from his talk of that title delivered to the Victorian Association for Library Automation. He has a captioned and uncaptioned version of the screencast linked. These are screencasts of his lecture, which means they both are very large files. Even on broadband, give either one some time to download. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mytwopence</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-125974</link>
		<dc:creator>mytwopence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-125974</guid>
		<description>Web 2 will destroy net neutrality, forget all the bells and whistles we shall get . Governments around the world will use this as a means to tax the internet and control content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2 will destroy net neutrality, forget all the bells and whistles we shall get . Governments around the world will use this as a means to tax the internet and control content.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebNotiX.be &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nice plain-English guide of Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-124035</link>
		<dc:creator>WebNotiX.be &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nice plain-English guide of Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1807#comment-124035</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/12/06/free-video-recognizing-web-20/</a> [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
