<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usability Double-whammy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: elemental70</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-97452</link>
		<dc:creator>elemental70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-97452</guid>
		<description>Looks good! Looking forward to this release. As far as the poster that stated corporate developers are the only ones who care, once you explain the potential legal ramifications as well as the positive (ie less bandwidth more customers) benefits, its not really a debate anymore. Except for those that truly don't care about their users, and they are ignorant.

Nuff said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good! Looking forward to this release. As far as the poster that stated corporate developers are the only ones who care, once you explain the potential legal ramifications as well as the positive (ie less bandwidth more customers) benefits, its not really a debate anymore. Except for those that truly don&#8217;t care about their users, and they are ignorant.</p>
<p>Nuff said</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dev_cw</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-96899</link>
		<dc:creator>dev_cw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-96899</guid>
		<description>Great initiative by SP. A usability blog will be well received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great initiative by SP. A usability blog will be well received.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexW</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-96629</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-96629</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;usability is such a subjective thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, it's not really. There are plenty of ways to objectively measure usability. For example, it's relatively simple to set a task for a group of users and measure if it's completed -- and how long that takes. 

No ambiguity there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>usability is such a subjective thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not really. There are plenty of ways to objectively measure usability. For example, it&#8217;s relatively simple to set a task for a group of users and measure if it&#8217;s completed &#8212; and how long that takes. </p>
<p>No ambiguity there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Besseling</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-96608</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Besseling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-96608</guid>
		<description>Great to see Sitepoint coming out with a Usability kit. (about time).

Hopefully some of the negativity around implementing usability techniques for your readers will change with such easy to use information.

As for the bloke who said 'noone cares about usability' and that 'usablity is subjective' I suggest that they should be one of the first to buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see Sitepoint coming out with a Usability kit. (about time).</p>
<p>Hopefully some of the negativity around implementing usability techniques for your readers will change with such easy to use information.</p>
<p>As for the bloke who said &#8216;noone cares about usability&#8217; and that &#8216;usablity is subjective&#8217; I suggest that they should be one of the first to buy it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Magain</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-96427</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Magain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-96427</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;usability is such a sbjective thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That may be true, but there is a science to finding out what it is that works for your audience. It's that process that the kit teaches, not "you should always make your sites like this". The blueprints are guidelines to help you get started, but not a silver bullet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>usability is such a sbjective thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>That may be true, but there is a science to finding out what it is that works for your audience. It&#8217;s that process that the kit teaches, not &#8220;you should always make your sites like this&#8221;. The blueprints are guidelines to help you get started, but not a silver bullet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamermk</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-96272</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamermk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-96272</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No one pays attention to useability except corporate developers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And the users... but eh they aren't really that important now are they.

Just because your everyday user doesn't use the word usability to describe his problem, doesn't change that poor usability often is the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No one pays attention to useability except corporate developers.</p></blockquote>
<p>And the users&#8230; but eh they aren&#8217;t really that important now are they.</p>
<p>Just because your everyday user doesn&#8217;t use the word usability to describe his problem, doesn&#8217;t change that poor usability often is the problem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhoom</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-96158</link>
		<dc:creator>dhoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-96158</guid>
		<description>usability is such a sbjective thing. Some things common sense fror one set of people are total no no for others 
dhoom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>usability is such a sbjective thing. Some things common sense fror one set of people are total no no for others<br />
dhoom</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Magain</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-95960</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Magain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-95960</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt, I've snuck in a link there now ;-)

Glad you approve of the blueprints approach. I think it's what makes the kit so valuable--taking &lt;a href="http://webpatterns.org/"&gt;web patterns&lt;/a&gt; and making them useful and immediately applicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt, I&#8217;ve snuck in a link there now ;-)</p>
<p>Glad you approve of the blueprints approach. I think it&#8217;s what makes the kit so valuable&#8211;taking <a href="http://webpatterns.org/">web patterns</a> and making them useful and immediately applicable.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt_Machell</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-95956</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_Machell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-95956</guid>
		<description>Good to see a ruthlessly practical approach being taken, breaking it down into common site elements is a very, er, usable approach, which I can see really appealing to the hassled developer/designer. Good luck with it! 

I think the &lt;a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/books/usability1/toc.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Table of Contents&lt;/a&gt; is well worth pointing people at.

Oh, and the Widgets look like a great gimmick (and useful too!)

-Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see a ruthlessly practical approach being taken, breaking it down into common site elements is a very, er, usable approach, which I can see really appealing to the hassled developer/designer. Good luck with it! </p>
<p>I think the <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/books/usability1/toc.php" rel="nofollow">Table of Contents</a> is well worth pointing people at.</p>
<p>Oh, and the Widgets look like a great gimmick (and useful too!)</p>
<p>-Matt</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/11/16/usability-double-whammy/#comment-95778</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1783#comment-95778</guid>
		<description>No one pays attention to useability except corporate developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one pays attention to useability except corporate developers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
