<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browsershots.org: Test nine browsers for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tecnomeme.it</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-603122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tecnomeme.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-603122</guid>
		<description>hmm.. just tested my website on Browsershots, but i got different "live" results on IE and Firefox.. can i ask others if did they find this service reliable?

I also jotted down a list of other cross-browser testing tools at http://www.tecnomeme.it/web-design_web/cross-browser-testing-tools (please moderators remove this line if it's again your policies, thank you).

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.. just tested my website on Browsershots, but i got different &#8220;live&#8221; results on IE and Firefox.. can i ask others if did they find this service reliable?</p>
<p>I also jotted down a list of other cross-browser testing tools at <a href="http://www.tecnomeme.it/web-design_web/cross-browser-testing-tools" rel="nofollow">http://www.tecnomeme.it/web-design_web/cross-browser-testing-tools</a> (please moderators remove this line if it&#8217;s again your policies, thank you).</p>
<p>cheers</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-89701</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-89701</guid>
		<description>For IE7 and IE6 I found another free alternative to browsershots, which seems to be quite fast: &lt;a href="http://ipinfo.info/html-web-renderer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;IE Web Renderer&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For IE7 and IE6 I found another free alternative to browsershots, which seems to be quite fast: <a href="http://ipinfo.info/html-web-renderer/" rel="nofollow">IE Web Renderer</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sun</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-78189</link>
		<dc:creator>sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-78189</guid>
		<description>It should be mentioned that BrowserShots.org wants to build up a browser-shooting community. Everyone who's got a unused PC can turn it into a BrowserShot factory, helping to serve more different browsers on any platform.

See http://browsershots.org/factories/ for a current list of so called "ShotFactories".

Read the FAQ on http://v02.browsershots.org/trac/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions to help out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be mentioned that BrowserShots.org wants to build up a browser-shooting community. Everyone who&#8217;s got a unused PC can turn it into a BrowserShot factory, helping to serve more different browsers on any platform.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://browsershots.org/factories/" rel="nofollow">http://browsershots.org/factories/</a> for a current list of so called &#8220;ShotFactories&#8221;.</p>
<p>Read the FAQ on <a href="http://v02.browsershots.org/trac/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions" rel="nofollow">http://v02.browsershots.org/trac/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions</a> to help out!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malikyte</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-75108</link>
		<dc:creator>malikyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-75108</guid>
		<description>I was using BrowserShots back in my last college's first year.  That was over 3 years ago.  It's a great service and he's still tweaking and playing around with it all.  I'm surprised (yet overjoyed) it's still free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using BrowserShots back in my last college&#8217;s first year.  That was over 3 years ago.  It&#8217;s a great service and he&#8217;s still tweaking and playing around with it all.  I&#8217;m surprised (yet overjoyed) it&#8217;s still free.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birnam</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-74984</link>
		<dc:creator>birnam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-74984</guid>
		<description>I've used Browsershots off and on for the last year or so. It's a great system, but it's always seemed very slow (I never paid for a line-jump), and the only browser I really need to test for is Safari. So instead of Browsershots, I use &lt;a href="http://www.browsrcamp.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;BrowsrCamp&lt;/a&gt;.  It's much faster. They even have a subscription server where you can "rent" a mac through VNC in order to actually interact with your page in real-time. I haven't used the paid-service yet, but it's nice to know it's there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Browsershots off and on for the last year or so. It&#8217;s a great system, but it&#8217;s always seemed very slow (I never paid for a line-jump), and the only browser I really need to test for is Safari. So instead of Browsershots, I use <a href="http://www.browsrcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">BrowsrCamp</a>.  It&#8217;s much faster. They even have a subscription server where you can &#8220;rent&#8221; a mac through VNC in order to actually interact with your page in real-time. I haven&#8217;t used the paid-service yet, but it&#8217;s nice to know it&#8217;s there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexW</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-74941</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-74941</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I was that jerk that posted it on Digg.com. He loved the attention and that he had a queue of over 2 days. It is an amazing service for those that want a quick bit of help. And for $5, you get put at the front of the line.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hehehe,.. we always destroy the things we love... ;) 

Unfortunately it's so tempting for most people to just type 'yahoo.com' into the box, just to see what happens, and all browsers are ticked by default. 

It's very good though. I didn't pay and started getting results back in minutes. IE7 seems to currently crop off at the view port, but other than that it's very solid for an alpha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I was that jerk that posted it on Digg.com. He loved the attention and that he had a queue of over 2 days. It is an amazing service for those that want a quick bit of help. And for $5, you get put at the front of the line.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hehehe,.. we always destroy the things we love&#8230; ;) </p>
<p>Unfortunately it&#8217;s so tempting for most people to just type &#8216;yahoo.com&#8217; into the box, just to see what happens, and all browsers are ticked by default. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s very good though. I didn&#8217;t pay and started getting results back in minutes. IE7 seems to currently crop off at the view port, but other than that it&#8217;s very solid for an alpha.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gumbystation</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-74932</link>
		<dc:creator>gumbystation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-74932</guid>
		<description>I was that jerk that posted it on Digg.com.  He loved the attention and that he had a queue of over 2 days.  It is an amazing service for those that want a quick bit of help.  And for $5, you get put at the front of the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was that jerk that posted it on Digg.com.  He loved the attention and that he had a queue of over 2 days.  It is an amazing service for those that want a quick bit of help.  And for $5, you get put at the front of the line.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherStorm.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/10/27/browsershotsorg-test-nine-browser-for-free/#comment-74931</link>
		<dc:creator>AnotherStorm.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1753#comment-74931</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I've been using BrowserShots for a few months now, and it's undergone some interesting changes in that time.  You used to have to get in line for days at a time.  Now, if the service can't get you done in a few hours, they kick you out and let you try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve been using BrowserShots for a few months now, and it&#8217;s undergone some interesting changes in that time.  You used to have to get in line for days at a time.  Now, if the service can&#8217;t get you done in a few hours, they kick you out and let you try again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
