<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WD06: Kelly Goto, &#8220;Designing for Lifestyle&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/09/28/wd06-kelly-goto-designing-for-lifestyle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/09/28/wd06-kelly-goto-designing-for-lifestyle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/09/28/wd06-kelly-goto-designing-for-lifestyle/#comment-67660</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1723#comment-67660</guid>
		<description>Cute Cute Cute...if your target audience is childern between the ages of 5-9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute Cute Cute&#8230;if your target audience is childern between the ages of 5-9.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamermk</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/09/28/wd06-kelly-goto-designing-for-lifestyle/#comment-63339</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamermk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1723#comment-63339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Goto noted that one of the staples of “2.0 design”, as she called it, is to make everything look “cute, cute, cute, so that we can’t help but want to interact with it.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Does this mean 2.0 is for women? Last time I checked men weren't exactly jumping to interact with something cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Goto noted that one of the staples of “2.0 design”, as she called it, is to make everything look “cute, cute, cute, so that we can’t help but want to interact with it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Does this mean 2.0 is for women? Last time I checked men weren&#8217;t exactly jumping to interact with something cute.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/09/28/wd06-kelly-goto-designing-for-lifestyle/#comment-63272</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1723#comment-63272</guid>
		<description>Uh, "cute, cute, cute" whatever.  Web 2.0 looks like crappy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, &#8220;cute, cute, cute&#8221; whatever.  Web 2.0 looks like crappy right now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
