<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSCON 2006: No Flash Required: Interactive Browser Graphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/#comment-761879</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1658#comment-761879</guid>
		<description>i must say Why the heck would anyone bother with SVG and VML when Flash is easily available for almost every platform and every browser? There’s a plethora of cheap easy-to-use tools out there that will produce interactive swfs, so what’s the attraction?
www.jeffpaulportal.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i must say Why the heck would anyone bother with SVG and VML when Flash is easily available for almost every platform and every browser? There’s a plethora of cheap easy-to-use tools out there that will produce interactive swfs, so what’s the attraction?<br />
<a href="http://www.jeffpaulportal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jeffpaulportal.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danjo_Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/#comment-42102</link>
		<dc:creator>Danjo_Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1658#comment-42102</guid>
		<description>I hope to use VML soon, (my audience is IE only).. BUT.. at the same time prepare for future use of the data by such applications as SVG and Flash.

So I hope by putting all my data in XML first, then displaying in VML, I will be allowing myself the room I need for a future redesign of the data in something *besides* VML.

Any hurdles I may need to cross?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope to use VML soon, (my audience is IE only).. BUT.. at the same time prepare for future use of the data by such applications as SVG and Flash.</p>
<p>So I hope by putting all my data in XML first, then displaying in VML, I will be allowing myself the room I need for a future redesign of the data in something *besides* VML.</p>
<p>Any hurdles I may need to cross?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Yank</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/#comment-42061</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1658#comment-42061</guid>
		<description>what_the,

The problem with Flash is that it's a technology under the control of a single commercial entity. When you write to Flash, you put yourself at the mercy of Adobe's commercial interests. The fact that there is still no up-to-date Flash Player for Linux, for example, although Adobe keeps promising it is coming soon, is a result of this situation.

With open standards like SVG, you get the assurance that the availability of a technology does not hinge on the decisions of a single commercial entity, because these standards can always be reimplemented independently.

Flash has so many dependencies on proprietary codecs that it would be impossible to produce a free (as in freedom) implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what_the,</p>
<p>The problem with Flash is that it&#8217;s a technology under the control of a single commercial entity. When you write to Flash, you put yourself at the mercy of Adobe&#8217;s commercial interests. The fact that there is still no up-to-date Flash Player for Linux, for example, although Adobe keeps promising it is coming soon, is a result of this situation.</p>
<p>With open standards like SVG, you get the assurance that the availability of a technology does not hinge on the decisions of a single commercial entity, because these standards can always be reimplemented independently.</p>
<p>Flash has so many dependencies on proprietary codecs that it would be impossible to produce a free (as in freedom) implementation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what_the</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/#comment-42054</link>
		<dc:creator>what_the</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1658#comment-42054</guid>
		<description>Why the heck would anyone bother with SVG and VML when Flash is easily available for almost every platform and every browser? There's a plethora of cheap easy-to-use tools out there that will produce interactive swfs, so what's the attraction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the heck would anyone bother with SVG and VML when Flash is easily available for almost every platform and every browser? There&#8217;s a plethora of cheap easy-to-use tools out there that will produce interactive swfs, so what&#8217;s the attraction?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dojo.foo &#187; Catch All</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/#comment-41935</link>
		<dc:creator>dojo.foo &#187; Catch All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 02:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1658#comment-41935</guid>
		<description>[...] Gavin Doughtie and Jon Stewart gave a great overview of the current state of vector 2D APIs in browsers these days, including Gavin&#8217;s hard work on the new dojo.gfx namespace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gavin Doughtie and Jon Stewart gave a great overview of the current state of vector 2D APIs in browsers these days, including Gavin&#8217;s hard work on the new dojo.gfx namespace. [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dojo.foo &#187; SVG and Dojo at OSCON</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/07/29/oscon-2006-no-flash-required-interactive-browser-graphics/#comment-41489</link>
		<dc:creator>dojo.foo &#187; SVG and Dojo at OSCON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1658#comment-41489</guid>
		<description>[...] SitePoint has a nice entry about Gavin&#8217;s SVG and Dojo talk from OSCON. (slides) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SitePoint has a nice entry about Gavin&#8217;s SVG and Dojo talk from OSCON. (slides) [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
