Comments on: First Look: Google Web Toolkit

By: John

John — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:55:20 +0000

The point of coding in java vs. js is that it is complicated to program in many different browsers, and yes you’re letting google take care of cross-compatibility for you. Also using java in your applications is much better because it’s object-oriented. Yeah sure you can use “classes” in js, but it’s still a procedural language.

By: OJ

OJ — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:29:12 +0000

Hi Kev, you say that the client-side code is server-agnostic, do you have any step-by-step process so we can extract the widgets from the JARs? Thanks.

By: Easyrules

Easyrules — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:24:11 +0000

Its a good Article.

By: samanta

samanta — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:27:21 +0000

see below the error

table style=WIDTH: 100%; HEIGHT:250px” cellSpacing=0 cellpadding=0>

By: samanta

samanta — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:25:14 +0000

GWT Application is running over the Mozilla but not running in Microsoft IExplorer,projrct is running in Apache-Unix environment.

Application is running on Mozilla.

I am getting below error: when I am running the application in IExplorer6.0

I need the solution..

By: shakti

shakti — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:11:23 +0000

GWT Application is running over the Mozilla but not running in Microsoft IExplorer,projrct is running in Apache-Unix environment.
What is the solution..

By: sudhir

sudhir — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:45:23 +0000

take a look at Dojo, its also a gr8 ajax framework

sudhir

By: Yogi

Yogi — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:20:21 +0000

Hi,
As I’m looking for starting point to develop GWT application, I got many aspects without any proper approch. For a small application, you have to write so much code and it takes long time to develop it. It’s much easier to do using JS,HTML/DHTML.
And what is the point to write java code for JS,HTML/DHTML which later convert to JS, HTML?

By: magixMan

magixMan — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:45:56 +0000

Quite an interesting concept that might be suitable for building a large scale distributed application. I still can’t get my mind around whether it is worth the extra complexity for most applications. Browsers have come a long way and cross-platform JS is just not that difficult. Working in JS is much easier for most folks than Java. Still the real worry has been expressed in other posts. What happens when things go wrong? I don’t look forward tracking down subtle bugs that might occur in the translation to JS or that are browser specific.

By: itsjoker

itsjoker — Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:20:51 +0000

Agree Peter. Also a Java developer will cost a lot more. However, it is truly an alternative to hide your javascripts.