<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Your Site This Dynamic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ringobob</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-22411</link>
		<dc:creator>ringobob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 22:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-22411</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It looks like hiding the HTML was in their mind when they were writing it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It looks to me like they tried to write a site where all they had to do was copy a page and rename it, then add all of the content in the back-end and not have to bother with making any changes to an individual page.

At least, in-advisable as it may be, that would give the most logical reason for code like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It looks like hiding the HTML was in their mind when they were writing it.</p></blockquote>
<p>It looks to me like they tried to write a site where all they had to do was copy a page and rename it, then add all of the content in the back-end and not have to bother with making any changes to an individual page.</p>
<p>At least, in-advisable as it may be, that would give the most logical reason for code like that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csi95</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20323</link>
		<dc:creator>csi95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20323</guid>
		<description>You'd be amazed at how much work I get from clients who have a site like this.  Not &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; like this, but coded so poorly that I have to shake my head and wonder "What they heck was this guy thinking?!?"

Invariably the client paid next-to-nothing for the site, and the "developer" is now long gone and can't be found.  Off to college; out of business; moved out of state, etc.

Just proves that cliché -- a little knowledge can be dangerous.

And also -- You get what you pay for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d be amazed at how much work I get from clients who have a site like this.  Not <em>exactly</em> like this, but coded so poorly that I have to shake my head and wonder &#8220;What they heck was this guy thinking?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>Invariably the client paid next-to-nothing for the site, and the &#8220;developer&#8221; is now long gone and can&#8217;t be found.  Off to college; out of business; moved out of state, etc.</p>
<p>Just proves that cliché &#8212; a little knowledge can be dangerous.</p>
<p>And also &#8212; You get what you pay for!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannson</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20285</link>
		<dc:creator>hannson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20285</guid>
		<description>No, but he could get the php'ed javascript. But I think he meant that usually you shouldn't make static pages dynamic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but he could get the php&#8217;ed javascript. But I think he meant that usually you shouldn&#8217;t make static pages dynamic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20254</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20254</guid>
		<description>The Daily WTF is always hilarious and depressing at the same time.

Incidentally, someone in the Daily WTF forum said the new programmer could just view all the pages and do a View-&#62;Source to get the actual code.  But I don't think that would help.  When you do View-&#62;Source, you see the original HTML that the web page sent you, not any modifications that the JavaScript may have done to the DOM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Daily WTF is always hilarious and depressing at the same time.</p>
<p>Incidentally, someone in the Daily WTF forum said the new programmer could just view all the pages and do a View-&gt;Source to get the actual code.  But I don&#8217;t think that would help.  When you do View-&gt;Source, you see the original HTML that the web page sent you, not any modifications that the JavaScript may have done to the DOM.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotgazpacho</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20224</link>
		<dc:creator>hotgazpacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20224</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However there’s probably some easy extension you can get to view the output of Javascript stuff.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup, there is: &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/655/" rel="nofollow"&gt;View Source Chart&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However there’s probably some easy extension you can get to view the output of Javascript stuff.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup, there is: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/655/" rel="nofollow">View Source Chart</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal9k</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20215</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal9k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20215</guid>
		<description>It looks like hiding the HTML was in their mind when they were writing it.

However there's probably some easy extension you can get to view the output of Javascript stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like hiding the HTML was in their mind when they were writing it.</p>
<p>However there&#8217;s probably some easy extension you can get to view the output of Javascript stuff.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRoderick</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20157</link>
		<dc:creator>MRoderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20157</guid>
		<description>I've been asked to work on an "Enterprise" site, created just like this.

Debugging to find to source of a specific error, took several hours. Eventually the client decided to drop the site and their provider entirely.

Perhaps it was due to the enormous expenses for getting even the smallest adjustments made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been asked to work on an &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; site, created just like this.</p>
<p>Debugging to find to source of a specific error, took several hours. Eventually the client decided to drop the site and their provider entirely.</p>
<p>Perhaps it was due to the enormous expenses for getting even the smallest adjustments made.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BerislavLopac</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20061</link>
		<dc:creator>BerislavLopac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/04/26/is-your-site-this-dynamic/#comment-20061</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like the site was created by some code-generation software, written by people fluent in both Javascript and PHP...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like the site was created by some code-generation software, written by people fluent in both Javascript and PHP&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
