<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails 1.1!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: saumendra</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-17085</link>
		<dc:creator>saumendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-17085</guid>
		<description>Rails : is a framework not a programing laguage. Ruby runs on rail and the way rail framework is emmerging , with the MVC model , one can think of its simplicity   it makes for programmer. I find a intresting thing in Rails naming convention where a singular model class name &lt;em&gt;(mobile)&lt;/em&gt; maps to a plural database table &lt;em&gt;"mobiles"&lt;/em&gt;. Rails is smart about English pluralization rules, so  Person maps to people, and so forth.

Apart from the smartness it also got the xml configuration scheme ., like the ASP.NET congig files. Its comming up with the web 2.0 convention. 

Will ROCK Overall!!1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rails : is a framework not a programing laguage. Ruby runs on rail and the way rail framework is emmerging , with the MVC model , one can think of its simplicity   it makes for programmer. I find a intresting thing in Rails naming convention where a singular model class name <em>(mobile)</em> maps to a plural database table <em>&#8220;mobiles&#8221;</em>. Rails is smart about English pluralization rules, so  Person maps to people, and so forth.</p>
<p>Apart from the smartness it also got the xml configuration scheme ., like the ASP.NET congig files. Its comming up with the web 2.0 convention. </p>
<p>Will ROCK Overall!!1</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linsday Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-17080</link>
		<dc:creator>Linsday Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-17080</guid>
		<description>We're open to all discussions. But any meeting will have to be on the basis of withdrawing the First Job Contract. There have been five one-day public sector strikes in which millions of workers and students took part. An employers group has warned the protests are starting to hurt the economy. No Pasaran!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re open to all discussions. But any meeting will have to be on the basis of withdrawing the First Job Contract. There have been five one-day public sector strikes in which millions of workers and students took part. An employers group has warned the protests are starting to hurt the economy. No Pasaran!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohnnyj</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16999</link>
		<dc:creator>ohnnyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16999</guid>
		<description>@Sojan80

Check out &lt;a href="http://www.textdrive.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;TextDrive&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sojan80</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.textdrive.com/" rel="nofollow">TextDrive</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mickiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16873</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mickiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16873</guid>
		<description>Just thought I'd quickly jump in and let our blog readers know that SitePoint also has an active Ruby Discussion Forum happening at: &lt;a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=227" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=227&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d quickly jump in and let our blog readers know that SitePoint also has an active Ruby Discussion Forum happening at: <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=227" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=227</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sojan80</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16721</link>
		<dc:creator>Sojan80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16721</guid>
		<description>I'll be setting RoR up on my Mac fairly soon, just need to take care of a few minor details and tweaks. From what I have seen so far, RoR is pretty smooth. Are there a decent number of hosts out there for hosting RoR apps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be setting RoR up on my Mac fairly soon, just need to take care of a few minor details and tweaks. From what I have seen so far, RoR is pretty smooth. Are there a decent number of hosts out there for hosting RoR apps?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Chan :: Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marchin&#8217; On</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16620</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Chan :: Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marchin&#8217; On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 02:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16620</guid>
		<description>[...] waferbaby wrote a cool article for SitePoint and has jumped on board as a Ruby On Rails blogger. Rad. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] waferbaby wrote a cool article for SitePoint and has jumped on board as a Ruby On Rails blogger. Rad. [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir.Tayeb</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16613</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir.Tayeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16613</guid>
		<description>Sometimes economic causes may influence on my choise, which programming language I will use.

I'm like programming in JSP/Servlets but there aren't many J2EE shared hosting, this why I choose to program in PHP. maybe in later days when Ruby will be supported in more hosting companies (in my country: israel) I will start to write websites and application in Ruby &#38; RoR. I like Ruby more than PHP. It is more comfort to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes economic causes may influence on my choise, which programming language I will use.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m like programming in JSP/Servlets but there aren&#8217;t many J2EE shared hosting, this why I choose to program in PHP. maybe in later days when Ruby will be supported in more hosting companies (in my country: israel) I will start to write websites and application in Ruby &amp; RoR. I like Ruby more than PHP. It is more comfort to me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffco</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16611</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16611</guid>
		<description>Having said that, you won't really be needing PHP in order to develop a Rails application. Malikyte is right in saying that you use the best tool for the job. 

I'm liking RoR a lot. Makes me feel warm &#38; fuzzy inside :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having said that, you won&#8217;t really be needing PHP in order to develop a Rails application. Malikyte is right in saying that you use the best tool for the job. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m liking RoR a lot. Makes me feel warm &amp; fuzzy inside :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malikyte</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16607</link>
		<dc:creator>malikyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16607</guid>
		<description>@WebDevGuy: This could be argued 'til there's no need for a programming language at all.  The best response is to "use what's best for the job", and therefore, the response should be that it's just another tool in your programming belt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@WebDevGuy: This could be argued &#8217;til there&#8217;s no need for a programming language at all.  The best response is to &#8220;use what&#8217;s best for the job&#8221;, and therefore, the response should be that it&#8217;s just another tool in your programming belt.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebDevGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/28/rails-11/#comment-16606</link>
		<dc:creator>WebDevGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1495#comment-16606</guid>
		<description>Quesiton for everyone reading this, is Rails a replacement to PHP or just another tool in your programming belt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quesiton for everyone reading this, is Rails a replacement to PHP or just another tool in your programming belt?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
