<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: coComment Turns Blog Comments into Conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:15:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-13751</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/#comment-13751</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gamermk&lt;/strong&gt;:

I&#039;m not trying to start a flame war here, but I am bit annoyed. First of all, that&#039;s how trackbacks work. I referenced his post, so a bit of mine shows up here, since logically, if I&#039;m referencing his post, my post may have some relevance to what he&#039;s talking about. But, Kevin already explained that.

The other thing is... You said &quot;Is anyone else tired of &lt;strong&gt;this guy&lt;/strong&gt;...&quot;

What are you talking about? This is the first SitePoint blog post I&#039;ve EVER trackbacked on.

I think you have me confused with someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gamermk</strong>:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to start a flame war here, but I am bit annoyed. First of all, that&#8217;s how trackbacks work. I referenced his post, so a bit of mine shows up here, since logically, if I&#8217;m referencing his post, my post may have some relevance to what he&#8217;s talking about. But, Kevin already explained that.</p>
<p>The other thing is&#8230; You said &#8220;Is anyone else tired of <strong>this guy</strong>&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What are you talking about? This is the first SitePoint blog post I&#8217;ve EVER trackbacked on.</p>
<p>I think you have me confused with someone else.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris ward</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-13733</link>
		<dc:creator>chris ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/#comment-13733</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a bigger picture here that&#039;s going to shake up the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a bigger picture here that&#8217;s going to shake up the industry.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Yank</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-13655</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Yank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/#comment-13655</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Aside: Is anyone else tired of this guy piggy backing off of sitepoint blogs by posting where he references it in his own?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s actually our doing here at SitePoint, Gamermk. We figure someone posting about our blogs on his or her own site is equally valuable information to comments posted here, so we show them both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aside: Is anyone else tired of this guy piggy backing off of sitepoint blogs by posting where he references it in his own?</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s actually our doing here at SitePoint, Gamermk. We figure someone posting about our blogs on his or her own site is equally valuable information to comments posted here, so we show them both.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamermk</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-13635</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamermk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/#comment-13635</guid>
		<description>I must agree this is pretty exciting news. Definitely an encouraging evolution in the connectivity of online communities. 

Aside: Is anyone else tired of this guy piggy backing off of sitepoint blogs by posting where he references it in his own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree this is pretty exciting news. Definitely an encouraging evolution in the connectivity of online communities. </p>
<p>Aside: Is anyone else tired of this guy piggy backing off of sitepoint blogs by posting where he references it in his own?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coComment Future at joshteeters.org</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-13607</link>
		<dc:creator>coComment Future at joshteeters.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 02:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/06/cocomment-turns-blog-comments-into-conversations/#comment-13607</guid>
		<description>[...] coComment is far from perfect - I&#8217;ve outlined a few problems with it already on my blog here - but it&#8217;s still a great tool. It&#8217;ll be an even better tool once they work out some of the kinks. It is, after all, still in beta. Bonus: A nifty little piece from Kevin Yank at Sitepoint.com about coComment. Snippet: That said, I don’t think coComment has all the answers. For instance, as this Web-wide conversation platform develops, what should be posted as a comment and what should be posted on your own blog? If you use coComment to do both, how do you unite the two separate streams of conversation that may result? These are some of the interesting questions that will need to be answered and soon if the panacea of unrestricted online conversation that they propose is to be realized. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coComment is far from perfect &#8211; I&#8217;ve outlined a few problems with it already on my blog here &#8211; but it&#8217;s still a great tool. It&#8217;ll be an even better tool once they work out some of the kinks. It is, after all, still in beta. Bonus: A nifty little piece from Kevin Yank at Sitepoint.com about coComment. Snippet: That said, I don’t think coComment has all the answers. For instance, as this Web-wide conversation platform develops, what should be posted as a comment and what should be posted on your own blog? If you use coComment to do both, how do you unite the two separate streams of conversation that may result? These are some of the interesting questions that will need to be answered and soon if the panacea of unrestricted online conversation that they propose is to be realized. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
