Comments on: Google’s ‘bigdaddy’ datacenter

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 07 Apr 2006 06:59:29 +0000

This site uses reBlogger to collect all blogs posts about the Google (and Yahoo) index updates.

By: ano

ano — Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:27:12 +0000

WSHD Says: “Here is a tool I created for you to easily compare your serps. 3 results are shown: 1. Standard search, 2 and 3 are the bigdaddy datacenters. Enjoy!” Where?

By: Proofreader

Proofreader — Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:14:39 +0000

Matt “Cutt’s”? There is no excuse for that.

By: WSHD

WSHD — Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:23:15 +0000

Here is a tool I created for you to easily compare your serps. 3 results are shown: 1. Standard search, 2 and 3 are the bigdaddy datacenters. Enjoy!

By: charmedlover

charmedlover — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 22:59:46 +0000

I think that the SERPs are so much better. I just looked up my name and I see the searches are much more relevant showing my many accounts of websites you can find me at.

Plus my website has a few better ratings in some of the keywords we aim for.

By: peach

peach — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:52:29 +0000

After reading Matt’s post, I think my changed rankings (comment#1) are connected to google’s improved site: operator search.
interesting.. :)

By: peach

peach — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:46:53 +0000

Wow thanks for the heads up!

I’m definately seeing major differences, the new datacenter does not rank the index page of my large entertainment when I search for the name of this site, but it does rank the subsection index pages when searching for the site’s name… This could mean that the new datacenter seems to be more sensitive to my insite linking structure, wich was built to funnel pagerank to these section index pages.