<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landing Pages Now Influence AdWords Quality Scores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: milette</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-12141</link>
		<dc:creator>milette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/#comment-12141</guid>
		<description>Google hides behind the wall of secrecy to obscure and obfuscate their real policies and practices. In one experiment I did after Google changed their pricing model -- I pasted 1,000 keywords into AdWords account A and 915 keywords were disabled instantly demanding additional pay-per-click. (I bid originally $.05 ad the same keywords were running happily before the price model change.) Into another AdWords Account (B), I pasted the exact same list of keywords, and surprisingly over 900 of them were ACCEPTED at the $.05 per click bid. 

What was the difference between the accounts? Accounts A and B had been running for nearly the same amount of years. Account A had relatively low monthly billing (less than $20 per mont), while Account B had a very large budget (over $5,000 per month). 

Nowhere in Google&#039;s AdWords program do they EVER mention that they treat different customers differently -- but this is obviously the case. I can give many other examples.

Regarding Google&#039;s new AdWords pricing model -- they SAY that it will allow you to pay as little as $.01 per click -- but what they don&#039;t tell you is that it will be a cold day in hell before you&#039;ll FIND any keywords that you can actually buy for that amount.

Out of over 10,000 keywords I had running before the price model change, over 99% were rejected the day after -- demanding up to $5.00 per click for keywords that ran happily the previous day for $.05 per click (with excellent CTR).

Do no evil my ##.

Marty R. Milette
Custom Toolbars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google hides behind the wall of secrecy to obscure and obfuscate their real policies and practices. In one experiment I did after Google changed their pricing model &#8212; I pasted 1,000 keywords into AdWords account A and 915 keywords were disabled instantly demanding additional pay-per-click. (I bid originally $.05 ad the same keywords were running happily before the price model change.) Into another AdWords Account (B), I pasted the exact same list of keywords, and surprisingly over 900 of them were ACCEPTED at the $.05 per click bid. </p>
<p>What was the difference between the accounts? Accounts A and B had been running for nearly the same amount of years. Account A had relatively low monthly billing (less than $20 per mont), while Account B had a very large budget (over $5,000 per month). </p>
<p>Nowhere in Google&#8217;s AdWords program do they EVER mention that they treat different customers differently &#8212; but this is obviously the case. I can give many other examples.</p>
<p>Regarding Google&#8217;s new AdWords pricing model &#8212; they SAY that it will allow you to pay as little as $.01 per click &#8212; but what they don&#8217;t tell you is that it will be a cold day in hell before you&#8217;ll FIND any keywords that you can actually buy for that amount.</p>
<p>Out of over 10,000 keywords I had running before the price model change, over 99% were rejected the day after &#8212; demanding up to $5.00 per click for keywords that ran happily the previous day for $.05 per click (with excellent CTR).</p>
<p>Do no evil my ##.</p>
<p>Marty R. Milette<br />
Custom Toolbars</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charmedlover</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-11863</link>
		<dc:creator>charmedlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/#comment-11863</guid>
		<description>I think anyone really trying to sell something will already meet these requirements anyways.  It&#039;s part of the holy marketing concept that you have to make consumers happy, and this is how they&#039;re doing it.

Honestly I don&#039;t think that Google should have to tell you to do this, it should be implied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think anyone really trying to sell something will already meet these requirements anyways.  It&#8217;s part of the holy marketing concept that you have to make consumers happy, and this is how they&#8217;re doing it.</p>
<p>Honestly I don&#8217;t think that Google should have to tell you to do this, it should be implied.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/comment-page-1/#comment-11861</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/12/13/landing-pages-now-influence-adwords-quality-scores/#comment-11861</guid>
		<description>Google keeps referring to their guidelines as if they contain some sort of answer or solution, but they pretty much neglect the guidelines when it matters - serps.

I expect they&#039;ll fall back on the &quot;You can trust us, our motto is don&#039;t be evil&quot; line so commonly touted whenever Google is mentioned.

If I had to guess I would say they&#039;re doing this because Analytics might make a few people reconsider AdWords - if they&#039;ve concrete evidence that x in 100 people are a sale and the profit from x doesn&#039;t cover the advertising &amp; time it would be a sound decision to just pull the plug on AdWords.

That + YPN and soon MSN&#039;s advertising programs may make Google look less appealing, so naturally Google want to boost (or force) an increase in the chance of a sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google keeps referring to their guidelines as if they contain some sort of answer or solution, but they pretty much neglect the guidelines when it matters &#8211; serps.</p>
<p>I expect they&#8217;ll fall back on the &#8220;You can trust us, our motto is don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; line so commonly touted whenever Google is mentioned.</p>
<p>If I had to guess I would say they&#8217;re doing this because Analytics might make a few people reconsider AdWords &#8211; if they&#8217;ve concrete evidence that x in 100 people are a sale and the profit from x doesn&#8217;t cover the advertising &amp; time it would be a sound decision to just pull the plug on AdWords.</p>
<p>That + YPN and soon MSN&#8217;s advertising programs may make Google look less appealing, so naturally Google want to boost (or force) an increase in the chance of a sale.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
