<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phalanger &#8211; better than the real thing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:06:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; What won&#8217;t be in PHP 6</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-15461</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; What won&#8217;t be in PHP 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1311#comment-15461</guid>
		<description>[...] Excellent! That eliminates another major source of exploits (perhaps the biggest)&#8212;have moaned about that before here and here Tags: php, php6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excellent! That eliminates another major source of exploits (perhaps the biggest)&#8212;have moaned about that before here and here Tags: php, php6 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icdsoftware</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10961</link>
		<dc:creator>icdsoftware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 03:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1311#comment-10961</guid>
		<description>I agree... I think this is somewhat a waste of time. They could have spent that time much much better I feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; I think this is somewhat a waste of time. They could have spent that time much much better I feel.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etnu</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10947</link>
		<dc:creator>Etnu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1311#comment-10947</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;Is PHP popular because it is the most elegant programming language? Hardly. If you are using .NET, why use PHP over C#?&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Because PHP is a superior language in many areas (not all, certainly, but it&#039;s got several advantages over C#, especially when it comes to &quot;web&quot; stuff).

This seems like a silly thing, anyway. Why implement PHP in C# when there&#039;s already an existing code base? They&#039;re simply not going to be able to keep up with the main project&#039;s development, and will fork eventually to a point where they just won&#039;t be compatable.

Also, most advanced PHP developers have gotten used to the idea of being able to tweak / modify / alter internals. We love Open Source, and aren&#039;t keen on the idea of using something that isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is PHP popular because it is the most elegant programming language? Hardly. If you are using .NET, why use PHP over C#?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because PHP is a superior language in many areas (not all, certainly, but it&#8217;s got several advantages over C#, especially when it comes to &#8220;web&#8221; stuff).</p>
<p>This seems like a silly thing, anyway. Why implement PHP in C# when there&#8217;s already an existing code base? They&#8217;re simply not going to be able to keep up with the main project&#8217;s development, and will fork eventually to a point where they just won&#8217;t be compatable.</p>
<p>Also, most advanced PHP developers have gotten used to the idea of being able to tweak / modify / alter internals. We love Open Source, and aren&#8217;t keen on the idea of using something that isn&#8217;t.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Reimer</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10943</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Reimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1311#comment-10943</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Right now’s it’s still a Windows only solution which will be a turn off for many.

...Another barrier is the authors aren’t really being open (as in Open Source) with Phalanger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then it destroys two significant reasons for PHP&#039;s uptake. How would this would ever turn up on $5/month web hosts?

Is PHP popular because it is the most elegant programming language? Hardly. If you are using .NET, why use PHP over C#?

PHP is a platform for dynamic web content which is:

1) free
2) simple
3) cross platform deployable

Unless Phalanger can boast the same it certainly will be an &quot;also ran&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Right now’s it’s still a Windows only solution which will be a turn off for many.</p>
<p>&#8230;Another barrier is the authors aren’t really being open (as in Open Source) with Phalanger.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then it destroys two significant reasons for PHP&#8217;s uptake. How would this would ever turn up on $5/month web hosts?</p>
<p>Is PHP popular because it is the most elegant programming language? Hardly. If you are using .NET, why use PHP over C#?</p>
<p>PHP is a platform for dynamic web content which is:</p>
<p>1) free<br />
2) simple<br />
3) cross platform deployable</p>
<p>Unless Phalanger can boast the same it certainly will be an &#8220;also ran&#8221;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris ward</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/18/phalanger-better-than-the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10924</link>
		<dc:creator>chris ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1311#comment-10924</guid>
		<description>I have PHP and C#.net running on apache2 on a win2003 box, with a mySQL5 DB.

The lines are already becoming very blurred, and my php code is becoming legacy.

Now if IIS could only emulate mod_rewrite properly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have PHP and C#.net running on apache2 on a win2003 box, with a mySQL5 DB.</p>
<p>The lines are already becoming very blurred, and my php code is becoming legacy.</p>
<p>Now if IIS could only emulate mod_rewrite properly!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
