<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla XForms Project threatened by cut-backs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/comment-page-1/#comment-11066</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/#comment-11066</guid>
		<description>Maybe this will mean webforms will be the future and not xforms... I mean other browsers seem not to want to support xforms but rather webforms including a lot of mozilla developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this will mean webforms will be the future and not xforms&#8230; I mean other browsers seem not to want to support xforms but rather webforms including a lot of mozilla developers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Mozilla и XForms &#171; Заметки веб-разработчика &#171; ZOOB</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/comment-page-1/#comment-10796</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Mozilla и XForms &#171; Заметки веб-разработчика &#171; ZOOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/#comment-10796</guid>
		<description>[...] Судя по всему поддержки XForms в Мозилле пока не будет. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Судя по всему поддержки XForms в Мозилле пока не будет. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Bruchez</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/comment-page-1/#comment-10776</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Bruchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/#comment-10776</guid>
		<description>This is a sad news. It is necessary that XForms implementations are developed so that application developers can evaluate the technology through more than an abstract specification. And XForms is really worth it: it&#039;s not a question of whether you can do things without XForms, of course you can. But XForms&#039;s programming model is extremely powerful and cross-platform, and that makes it unique. Once you&#039;ve started working with XForms, you simply can&#039;t imagine how you developped web apps before.

Let&#039;s hope IBM or other developers pick up the Firefox implementation. Luckily, in spite of this, there are other XForms implementations in the works, but a native Firefox implementation of XForms 1.0 would definitely be a major boost for XForms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a sad news. It is necessary that XForms implementations are developed so that application developers can evaluate the technology through more than an abstract specification. And XForms is really worth it: it&#8217;s not a question of whether you can do things without XForms, of course you can. But XForms&#8217;s programming model is extremely powerful and cross-platform, and that makes it unique. Once you&#8217;ve started working with XForms, you simply can&#8217;t imagine how you developped web apps before.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope IBM or other developers pick up the Firefox implementation. Luckily, in spite of this, there are other XForms implementations in the works, but a native Firefox implementation of XForms 1.0 would definitely be a major boost for XForms.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericshawnSentry</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/comment-page-1/#comment-10771</link>
		<dc:creator>ericshawnSentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/#comment-10771</guid>
		<description>Like any of the newer technologies, Xforms need to reach a critical mass before usership becomes ubiquitous.  Kind of like no one will hire you without experience, and you can&#039;t get any experience until someone hires you.


Eric Shawn - Sentrylogin.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like any of the newer technologies, Xforms need to reach a critical mass before usership becomes ubiquitous.  Kind of like no one will hire you without experience, and you can&#8217;t get any experience until someone hires you.</p>
<p>Eric Shawn &#8211; Sentrylogin.com</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etnu</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/comment-page-1/#comment-10760</link>
		<dc:creator>Etnu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/mozilla-xforms-project-threatened-by-cutbacks/#comment-10760</guid>
		<description>If xforms is deemed important enough, it&#039;s sure to live on, whether it&#039;s developed entirely by volunteers or gets funding from corporate entities with incentives to do so.

Right now, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to be considered &quot;important enough&quot;. Xforms is interesting, to be sure, but it&#039;s really not a show-stopper for most things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If xforms is deemed important enough, it&#8217;s sure to live on, whether it&#8217;s developed entirely by volunteers or gets funding from corporate entities with incentives to do so.</p>
<p>Right now, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to be considered &#8220;important enough&#8221;. Xforms is interesting, to be sure, but it&#8217;s really not a show-stopper for most things.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
