<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 beta 2 bumped to 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/</link>
	<description>News, opinion, and fresh thinking for web developers and designers. The official podcast of sitepoint.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:35:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-13012</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-13012</guid>
		<description>It may have been pushed back, but you can give the Beta 2 Preview a try though if you would like:

http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=263</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may have been pushed back, but you can give the Beta 2 Preview a try though if you would like:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=263" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=263</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12740</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-12740</guid>
		<description>if they force out ie 7 to replace ie 5 chances are that the old machines running it won&#039;t be able to handle the app and that will only work if microsoft decides to release it for older OS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they force out ie 7 to replace ie 5 chances are that the old machines running it won&#8217;t be able to handle the app and that will only work if microsoft decides to release it for older OS</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12668</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-12668</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It would be nice to see more cross browser similarities between the FF and IE.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The only similarities that i like between FF nd IE7 is the tabbed browsing, It should end there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It would be nice to see more cross browser similarities between the FF and IE.</p></blockquote>
<p>The only similarities that i like between FF nd IE7 is the tabbed browsing, It should end there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Hume</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-11687</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-11687</guid>
		<description>I think Microsoft are right to hold back Beta 2 until they&#039;ve got something they want to show. There was a huge kerfuffle when B1 didn&#039;t deliver on bug fixes from IE6, and MS have said they&#039;re going to get something done about this. Let&#039;s let them get on with it and judge it when they&#039;re ready for developer input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Microsoft are right to hold back Beta 2 until they&#8217;ve got something they want to show. There was a huge kerfuffle when B1 didn&#8217;t deliver on bug fixes from IE6, and MS have said they&#8217;re going to get something done about this. Let&#8217;s let them get on with it and judge it when they&#8217;re ready for developer input.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-11466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-11466</guid>
		<description>There are still too mahy user using ie6 or below, for us css developers ie7 should have been out ages ago. The sooner they release this as a mandatory update the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still too mahy user using ie6 or below, for us css developers ie7 should have been out ages ago. The sooner they release this as a mandatory update the better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magistudios</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-11400</link>
		<dc:creator>magistudios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-11400</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I will stay carry on with firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wonder if the release of Firefox 1.5 had anything to do with the date change?  It would be nice to see more cross browser similarities between the FF and IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I will stay carry on with firefox.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder if the release of Firefox 1.5 had anything to do with the date change?  It would be nice to see more cross browser similarities between the FF and IE.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin23</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-10782</link>
		<dc:creator>martin23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-10782</guid>
		<description>Who cares?

I will stay carry on with firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares?</p>
<p>I will stay carry on with firefox.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikeo</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-10780</link>
		<dc:creator>ikeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-10780</guid>
		<description>surprise surprise ... microsoft missed another deadline ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surprise surprise &#8230; microsoft missed another deadline &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csi95</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-10779</link>
		<dc:creator>csi95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-10779</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has a long history of hitting the date, regardless if the code is right.

I&#039;m happy to let them delay as long as needed, just so long as it&#039;s bug free when it&#039;s released.

AND, I want it a mandatory download on windows update.  The sooner we get rid of IE 5 and IE 6, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has a long history of hitting the date, regardless if the code is right.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to let them delay as long as needed, just so long as it&#8217;s bug free when it&#8217;s released.</p>
<p>AND, I want it a mandatory download on windows update.  The sooner we get rid of IE 5 and IE 6, the better.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrsmiley</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-10774</link>
		<dc:creator>mrsmiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/13/ie7-beta-2-bumped-to-2006/#comment-10774</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy to say that I haven&#039;t noticed any bugs so far in th Beta 1 version.  It does render CSS a lot nicer though which is a bonus.  The fact of the matter is that if you dont use hacks to render your pages, then you probably wont notice the difference at all except now you have some new toys to play with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to say that I haven&#8217;t noticed any bugs so far in th Beta 1 version.  It does render CSS a lot nicer though which is a bonus.  The fact of the matter is that if you dont use hacks to render your pages, then you probably wont notice the difference at all except now you have some new toys to play with.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
