<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Pop, or Not to Pop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Paine</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10679</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10679</guid>
		<description>I think we've got some terminology confusion going on. AFAIK, a pop-under is exactly like a typical pop-up except that it immediately gives focus back to the parent window, so hopefully the user isn't distracted at the moment and doesn't notice the advertisement till later once they've closed the browser window. dictionary.com agrees with me http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pop-under , and that's the sort of ad I was complaining about sitepoint using (they launched onclick in the body of the page instead of onload to beat the pop-up blocker, though I haven't seen one for a few days now).

However, I see Christian is using the term to mean 'dhtml pop-up simulation.' Were others using it this way and I've been talking about the wrong thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ve got some terminology confusion going on. AFAIK, a pop-under is exactly like a typical pop-up except that it immediately gives focus back to the parent window, so hopefully the user isn&#8217;t distracted at the moment and doesn&#8217;t notice the advertisement till later once they&#8217;ve closed the browser window. dictionary.com agrees with me <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pop-under" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pop-under</a> , and that&#8217;s the sort of ad I was complaining about sitepoint using (they launched onclick in the body of the page instead of onload to beat the pop-up blocker, though I haven&#8217;t seen one for a few days now).</p>
<p>However, I see Christian is using the term to mean &#8216;dhtml pop-up simulation.&#8217; Were others using it this way and I&#8217;ve been talking about the wrong thing?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Heilmann</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10678</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Heilmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10678</guid>
		<description>Interesting timing. I just published an article on how to create pop-unders in a cleaner way:
http://icant.co.uk/articles/how-to-create-popunders/

Personally I don't like them much either, but in this case, a friend really needed to advertise a change and simply explaining it was just not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting timing. I just published an article on how to create pop-unders in a cleaner way:<br />
<a href="http://icant.co.uk/articles/how-to-create-popunders/" rel="nofollow">http://icant.co.uk/articles/how-to-create-popunders/</a></p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t like them much either, but in this case, a friend really needed to advertise a change and simply explaining it was just not enough.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmsiever</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10649</link>
		<dc:creator>kmsiever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10649</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;many editors have an obvious bias against sites that exist for profit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps, but having been an editor for the past five years, I can say that &lt;strong&gt;most&lt;/strong&gt; editors do not have a bias against sites that exist for profit. In fact, we have several categories devoted to for-profit sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>many editors have an obvious bias against sites that exist for profit.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps, but having been an editor for the past five years, I can say that <strong>most</strong> editors do not have a bias against sites that exist for profit. In fact, we have several categories devoted to for-profit sites.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspen</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10647</link>
		<dc:creator>aspen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10647</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“For general audience sites the average rate for a leaderboard from an ad network nowadays is going to be less than $1 CPM”

That’s because leaderboard ads suck. There’s no reason why you can’t get an average of $3-5 CPM (primary unit) from adsense ($7-8 page eCPM). If you’re in a lucrative niche market (web development, finance, etc.), you will easily be sucking in $8+ CPM. Once your traffic is significant, you should be able to direct-sell ads which you can typically get $0.50—$2.00 CPC for (a $10-40 CPM if you have even a 2% CTR).

Most popunder clicks are on accident. 

Also, the most lucrative ad network out there (by far) is adsense, and you can’t use popunders / popups with adsense. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course thats mostly true, so you'll notice I said general audience site. Meaning a site with no specific demographic. 

What's not true about what you said is that you cannot use popunders with adsense. You cannot advertise adsense in a popunder, but you can use adsense on pages with popunders. Adsense also isn't always the most lucrative ad network out there, it depends entirely on your site's topic and demographic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“For general audience sites the average rate for a leaderboard from an ad network nowadays is going to be less than $1 CPM”</p>
<p>That’s because leaderboard ads suck. There’s no reason why you can’t get an average of $3-5 CPM (primary unit) from adsense ($7-8 page eCPM). If you’re in a lucrative niche market (web development, finance, etc.), you will easily be sucking in $8+ CPM. Once your traffic is significant, you should be able to direct-sell ads which you can typically get $0.50—$2.00 CPC for (a $10-40 CPM if you have even a 2% CTR).</p>
<p>Most popunder clicks are on accident. </p>
<p>Also, the most lucrative ad network out there (by far) is adsense, and you can’t use popunders / popups with adsense.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course thats mostly true, so you&#8217;ll notice I said general audience site. Meaning a site with no specific demographic. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s not true about what you said is that you cannot use popunders with adsense. You cannot advertise adsense in a popunder, but you can use adsense on pages with popunders. Adsense also isn&#8217;t always the most lucrative ad network out there, it depends entirely on your site&#8217;s topic and demographic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xhtmlcoder</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10645</link>
		<dc:creator>xhtmlcoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10645</guid>
		<description>I am still a DMOZ Editor and luckily I haven't had to deal with any submissions with pop unders.

I've had to deal with auto popups but didn't exclude the sites (even though they were really annoying and did damage credibility of the submission).

Though I suspect if the site was overrun with them I'd probably have to think very hard about the site content and it's real worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still a DMOZ Editor and luckily I haven&#8217;t had to deal with any submissions with pop unders.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had to deal with auto popups but didn&#8217;t exclude the sites (even though they were really annoying and did damage credibility of the submission).</p>
<p>Though I suspect if the site was overrun with them I&#8217;d probably have to think very hard about the site content and it&#8217;s real worth.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sojan80</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10639</link>
		<dc:creator>Sojan80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10639</guid>
		<description>In defense pf sitepoint (not that Matt's response needs any defending), I however, really like the catfish style ads that sitepoint runs. These are to me unobtrusive, and they don't interupt my surfing or reading of sitepoint content, so kudos to Sitepoint on that. That is something that is really important to me (being able to read the content without having to dodge ads) as I am on sitepoint almost daily for one reason or another, and even I hadn't noticed the "Don't show me any more ads link.

I have also purchased numerous sitepoint produced items in the past and will most likely continue to do so because unlike some other sites I also frquent, sitepoint seems to be right on top of a lot of the things currently going on around the web and they always provide me with meaningful, insightful articles that give me enough info to make up mind on stuff or point me to other resources.

So, with that said, thanks to Chris for the article on popunders. I thought it was good, and informative, and most definitely targeted towards what you primarily write about which is making your web site make money. Matt, thanks for pointing out the "don't show" links, even though I doubt I will ever use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In defense pf sitepoint (not that Matt&#8217;s response needs any defending), I however, really like the catfish style ads that sitepoint runs. These are to me unobtrusive, and they don&#8217;t interupt my surfing or reading of sitepoint content, so kudos to Sitepoint on that. That is something that is really important to me (being able to read the content without having to dodge ads) as I am on sitepoint almost daily for one reason or another, and even I hadn&#8217;t noticed the &#8220;Don&#8217;t show me any more ads link.</p>
<p>I have also purchased numerous sitepoint produced items in the past and will most likely continue to do so because unlike some other sites I also frquent, sitepoint seems to be right on top of a lot of the things currently going on around the web and they always provide me with meaningful, insightful articles that give me enough info to make up mind on stuff or point me to other resources.</p>
<p>So, with that said, thanks to Chris for the article on popunders. I thought it was good, and informative, and most definitely targeted towards what you primarily write about which is making your web site make money. Matt, thanks for pointing out the &#8220;don&#8217;t show&#8221; links, even though I doubt I will ever use it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etnu</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10631</link>
		<dc:creator>Etnu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10631</guid>
		<description>"For general audience sites the average rate for a leaderboard from an ad network nowadays is going to be less than $1 CPM"

That's because leaderboard ads suck. There's no reason why you can't get an average of $3-5 CPM (primary unit) from adsense ($7-8 page eCPM). If you're in a lucrative niche market (web development, finance, etc.), you will easily be sucking in $8+ CPM. Once your traffic is significant, you should be able to direct-sell ads which you can typically get $0.50 - $2.00 CPC for (a $10-40 CPM if you have even a 2% CTR).

Most popunder clicks are on accident. 

Also, the most lucrative ad network out there (by far) is adsense, and you can't use popunders / popups with adsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For general audience sites the average rate for a leaderboard from an ad network nowadays is going to be less than $1 CPM&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because leaderboard ads suck. There&#8217;s no reason why you can&#8217;t get an average of $3-5 CPM (primary unit) from adsense ($7-8 page eCPM). If you&#8217;re in a lucrative niche market (web development, finance, etc.), you will easily be sucking in $8+ CPM. Once your traffic is significant, you should be able to direct-sell ads which you can typically get $0.50 - $2.00 CPC for (a $10-40 CPM if you have even a 2% CTR).</p>
<p>Most popunder clicks are on accident. </p>
<p>Also, the most lucrative ad network out there (by far) is adsense, and you can&#8217;t use popunders / popups with adsense.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulchie</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10622</guid>
		<description>I really like the way SP does the popups! I only wish more webmasters did it the same way. Heck, the SP popup is actually neat! The first time I saw it... well I was impressed and I am guessing I wasn't the only one impressed.  

Well done SP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the way SP does the popups! I only wish more webmasters did it the same way. Heck, the SP popup is actually neat! The first time I saw it&#8230; well I was impressed and I am guessing I wasn&#8217;t the only one impressed.  </p>
<p>Well done SP.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Paine</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10616</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10616</guid>
		<description>Matt,
Thanks for responding. I'll accept that as a good-faith use of pop-ups, even if you are circumventing my browser settings. You can tell how much attention I pay to the actual pop-up ads, though, by the fact that in a few months of being annoyed by them, I never looked at one long enough to notice that link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
Thanks for responding. I&#8217;ll accept that as a good-faith use of pop-ups, even if you are circumventing my browser settings. You can tell how much attention I pay to the actual pop-up ads, though, by the fact that in a few months of being annoyed by them, I never looked at one long enough to notice that link.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mickiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/11/08/to-pop-or-not-to-pop/#comment-10615</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mickiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/?p=1289#comment-10615</guid>
		<description>All our pop-ups have a "don't show me ads ever again" link that sets a pernament cookie in your browser. Our goal certainly isn't to harass regular visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All our pop-ups have a &#8220;don&#8217;t show me ads ever again&#8221; link that sets a pernament cookie in your browser. Our goal certainly isn&#8217;t to harass regular visitors.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
